Births in two different delivery units in the same clinic – A prospective study of healthy primiparous women

Britt Ingeborg Eide,Svein Rasmussen,Anne Britt Vika Nilsen

doi:10.1186/1471-2393-9-25

Britt Ingeborg Eide, Svein Rasmussen + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-25

Copy DOI

Abstract

BackgroundEarlier studies indicate that midwife-led birth settings are associated with modest benefits, including reduced medical interventions and increased maternal satisfaction. The generalizability of these studies to birth settings with low intervention rates, like those generally found in Norway, is not obvious. The aim of the present study was to compare intervention rates associated with labour in low-risk women who begin their labour in a midwife-led unit and a conventional care unit.MethodsEligible participants were low-risk primiparas who met the criteria for delivery in the midwife-led ward regardless of which cohort they were allocated to. The two wards are localised at the same floor. Women in both cohorts received the same standardized public antenatal care by general medical practitioners and midwifes who were not involved in the delivery. After admission of a woman to the midwife-led ward, the next woman who met the inclusion criteria, but preferred delivery at the conventional delivery ward, was allocated to the conventional delivery ward cohort. Among the 252 women in the midwife-led ward cohort, 74 (29%) women were transferred to the conventional delivery ward during labour.ResultsEmergency caesarean and instrumental delivery rates in women who were admitted to the midwife-led and conventional birth wards were statistically non-different, but more women admitted to the conventional birth ward had episiotomy. More women in the conventional delivery ward received epidural analgesia, pudental nerve block and nitrous oxide, while more women in the midwife-led ward received opiates and non-pharmacological pain relief.ConclusionWe did not find evidence that starting delivery in the midwife-led setting offers the advantage of lower operative delivery rates. However, epidural analgesia, pudental nerve block and episiotomies were less often while non-pharmacological pain relief was often used in the midwife-led ward.

Highlights

Earlier studies indicate that midwife-led birth settings are associated with modest benefits, including reduced medical interventions and increased maternal satisfaction
More women in the midwife-led ward (MLW) cohort worked throughout pregnancy
The educational level in the MLW cohort was higher and more women were recorded as cohabitants

Summary

Introduction

Earlier studies indicate that midwife-led birth settings are associated with modest benefits, including reduced medical interventions and increased maternal satisfaction. The generalizability of these studies to birth settings with low intervention rates, like those generally found in Norway, is not obvious. The aim of the present study was to compare intervention rates associated with labour in low-risk women who begin their labour in a midwife-led unit and a conventional care unit. Since the 1970s, during a time of increase in the routine use of technology during labour, alternative birth settings for lowrisk women have been established in or near conventional labour wards for the care of pregnant women who prefer and require little or no medical intervention during labour [9]

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion