Birds in Western Australian wheatbelt reserves—implications for conservation

Abstract

Bird species richness in 22 reserves in the Western Australian wheatbelt was shown to be related not to isolation from adjacent uncleared land, either spatially or with time since clearing of land in their vicinity, but to area of reserve and certain reserve habitat variables. The nature of these relationships was examined with multiple regression analysis. Reserve area was the most important variable, except in some passerine groups, where numbers of plant species, vegetation associations, and plant life form and density classes in each vegetation stratum were, separately, more important than area. Eighty-two percent of the variation in the number of bird species was explained by area of reserve and number of plant species, indicating the importance of floristics to the total bird assemblage within reserves. The number of formations present (the broadest vegetation structural grouping used) did not explain any of the variation in species numbers in any of the bird groupings. There were more resident passerine species present in wheatbelt reserves than there were breeding passerine species on similar-sized southwestern Australian late-Pleistocene/Holocene islands, although the species versus area relationship of the resident habitat-specific passerines (P 5 group) was very similar to that of the island land-bird faunas. The P 5 species group contained many species which probably responded to wheatbelt reserves as islands; some of these species may fail to persist in the wheatbelt in the long term. Twenty-three species usually resident in reserves and 15 ‘non-residents’ were identified as being ‘vulnerable’ or of uncertain conservation status in the wheatbelt. Some vegetation formations within reserves were more important to birds than others; woodlands were most important both to resident and transient species. Most species do not appear to distinguish between shrublands and heaths as major habitats; Species richness versus formation area relationship suggest that insular patchiness for birds in the wheatbelt was manifest at the level of vegetation formations. Reserves as small as 80 ha were important sanctuaries for birds in the wheatbelt, although 1500 ha was considered a minimum area of reserve to conserve a local avifauna. Reserves of the order of 30,000–94,000 ha were required to contain most of the avifauna of the wheatbelt.