Abstract

Frugivory is a plant-animal mutualistic interaction carried out mostly by birds. It consists in the bird consumption of fruits with later dispersion of the plants' seeds, helping in the vegetation regeneration. Frugivory can be affected by the habitat fragmentation and introduction of exotic species, which may alter the species interaction by extinction or competitor introduction. This study aimed to compare the structure of the network of frugivorous interactions between birds and plants in native forest and eucalyptus plantation. Birds were captured by mist nets and had their feces collected. Later, the seeds were identified in laboratory. The records of fruit consumption by birds in the zoochoric plant species present in the study area were also conducted. The data collected was used to build a network of interactions and identify the most important network metrics, species, and ecological functional groups in the studied environments. The results showed that the species composition, the connectivity of the relationships, the importance of the species for the interaction networks and the number of subgroups within the networks were highly similar between the native forest and the eucalyptus plantation. This could be explained by the favorable conditions that the studied eucalyptus plantations presented, such as the lack of anthropogenic activities, well-developed understory, and the presence of native surrounding vegetation, allowing practically the same seed dispersal capacity in both types of environments.

Highlights

  • Ecosystems with extensive plantations of non-native trees, such as the eucalyptus monocultures, can extinguish local species by replacing native vegetation and simplifying the forest heterogeneity, alter the regional water resources, and diminish soil fertility (Marsden et al, 2001; Borsboom et al, 2002; Kanowski et al, 2005; Carnus et al, 2006; Valduga et al, 2016; Bayle, 2019)

  • In both native forest and eucalyptus plantation, the most common plant genus found in bird droppings was Miconia (Melastomataceae), followed by Leandra (Melastomataceae) and Myrsine (Primulaceae), the first two are undergrowth shrubs in the studied area, and the third being arboreal

  • No differences in seed dispersing by birds were found between native forests and eucalyptus plantations (t = 1.20, p = 0.25)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ecosystems with extensive plantations of non-native trees, such as the eucalyptus monocultures, can extinguish local species by replacing native vegetation and simplifying the forest heterogeneity, alter the regional water resources, and diminish soil fertility (Marsden et al, 2001; Borsboom et al, 2002; Kanowski et al, 2005; Carnus et al, 2006; Valduga et al, 2016; Bayle, 2019). Eucalyptus plantations can be used as fuelwood, replacing the use of indigenous species, and conserving native forests and wildlife, protecting soil from erosion, and help in habitat restoration by promoting the recruitment, establishment and succession of native woody species (Hobbs et al, 2003; Barlow et al, 2007; Brockerhoff et al, 2008; Bremer & Farley, 2010; Brockerhoff et al, 2013; Bayle, 2019) All these negative and positive effects have been much debated on whether they prevent forest regeneration To understand how a species becomes a key player in a network of mutualistic interactions, we need to ISSN On-Line: 1807-0205 ISSN Printed: 0031-1049 ISNI: 0000-0004-0384-1825

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call