Abstract
Biodiversity monitoring is central to conservation biology, allowing the evaluation of the conservation status of species or the assessment of mechanisms of biodiversity change. Birds are the first taxonomic group to be used to build headline indicators of biodiversity due to their worldwide spatial and temporal coverage and their popularity. However, the landscape of bird-monitoring practices has never been characterized quantitatively. To objectively explore the strengths and weaknesses of the massive bird-monitoring effort in Europe we assessed the bird-monitoring practices, acquired with a questionnaire-based survey, in a sample of monitoring programs. We identify major correlates of among-program variability and compare monitoring practices from our database to recommendations of best monitoring practices. In total, we obtained responses from 144 bird-monitoring programs. We distinguish three types of monitoring programs according to the number of people that they involve: small, local-scale programs (56%), medium or regional programs (19%), and large-scale, national and international, programs (23%). In total, the programs in our sample involved 27941 persons, investing 79298 person days per year. Our survey illustrated that 65% of programs collected quantitative indices of abundance (count data). The monitoring design in a majority of the programs could be improved, notably in terms of unbiased spatial coverage, sampling effort optimization, replicated sampling to account for variations in detection probability, and more efficient statistical use of the data. We discuss the main avenues for improvement in bird-monitoring practices that emerge from this comparison of current practices and published methodological recommendations. Nature Conservation 2: 41–57 (2012)
Highlights
Biodiversity and environmental monitoring provide fundamental information for tracking environmental changes, to diagnose population trajectories and to provide conservation biology with relevant data
The majority of programs of our database comprised of small programs, i.e. monitoring few bird species with few people. These programs were homogeneous in terms of practices for monitoring bird populations on a local scale using counts or even capture-markrecapture data to monitor population trends in detail
Monitoring programs share the common desire to determine what changes are occurring in bird populations and why these changes occur
Summary
Biodiversity and environmental monitoring provide fundamental information for tracking environmental changes, to diagnose population trajectories and to provide conservation biology with relevant data. Such information is required for the design and evaluation of biodiversity policies, conservation management, land use decisions, and environmental protection. Large databases collecting data on and rating monitoring practices are becoming available (Kull et al 2008; Lengyel et al 2008; Schmeller et al 2009) and provide the first opportunity for a quantitative assessment of how well monitoring practices match methodological recommendations
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
