Abstract
Objective: To evaluate bipolar scissors tonsillectomy by comparing it with traditional cold dissection tonsillectomy. The outcome measures used were: (1) intra-operative bleeding; (2) operative time; (3) post-operative pain; and (4) complication rates including reactionary and secondary hemorrhage. Method: A prospective, randomized multiunit study involving three teaching hospitals in Belfast. Fifty consecutive children aged 10–16 years undergoing tonsillectomy for recurrent or chronic tonsillitis, between March 2000 and September 2000 were recruited as a subgroup of 200 patients selected for this study. These children were analysed separately from the adults, in a pilot study for the above parameters. Results: The mean age of the study population was 14.3 years. Sixty-eight percent of the children were girls. Median intra-operative blood loss was 6 ml for bipolar scissors tonsillectomy and 86 ml for cold dissection tonsillectomy ( P<0.001). The median operative time was 10.5 min for bipolar scissors tonsillectomy compared to 14.5 min for the cold dissection method ( P=0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the pain scores between the two methods ( P>0.05). The overall reactionary hemorrhage rate was 4% while the overall secondary hemorrhage rate was 14%. The hospital readmission rate was 4%. The reactionary and secondary hemorrhage rates were unaffected by the surgical method. Conclusions: This pilot study has shown that bipolar scissors tonsillectomy is a relatively safe technique in children aged 10–16 years with a similar morbidity to the cold dissection method. Its use is associated with a significant decrease in surgical time and blood loss compared to the cold dissection method. These advantages make it a favourable instrument for pediatric tonsillectomy especially in this age group.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.