Abstract

ABSTRACTThe Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous interval represents a time of environmental upheaval and cataclysmic events, combined with disruptions to terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Historically, the Jurassic/Cretaceous (J/K) boundary was classified as one of eight mass extinctions. However, more recent research has largely overturned this view, revealing a much more complex pattern of biotic and abiotic dynamics than has previously been appreciated. Here, we present a synthesis of our current knowledge of Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous events, focusing particularly on events closest to the J/K boundary. We find evidence for a combination of short‐term catastrophic events, large‐scale tectonic processes and environmental perturbations, and major clade interactions that led to a seemingly dramatic faunal and ecological turnover in both the marine and terrestrial realms. This is coupled with a great reduction in global biodiversity which might in part be explained by poor sampling. Very few groups appear to have been entirely resilient to this J/K boundary ‘event’, which hints at a ‘cascade model’ of ecosystem changes driving faunal dynamics. Within terrestrial ecosystems, larger, more‐specialised organisms, such as saurischian dinosaurs, appear to have suffered the most. Medium‐sized tetanuran theropods declined, and were replaced by larger‐bodied groups, and basal eusauropods were replaced by neosauropod faunas. The ascent of paravian theropods is emphasised by escalated competition with contemporary pterosaur groups, culminating in the explosive radiation of birds, although the timing of this is obfuscated by biases in sampling. Smaller, more ecologically diverse terrestrial non‐archosaurs, such as lissamphibians and mammaliaforms, were comparatively resilient to extinctions, instead documenting the origination of many extant groups around the J/K boundary. In the marine realm, extinctions were focused on low‐latitude, shallow marine shelf‐dwelling faunas, corresponding to a significant eustatic sea‐level fall in the latest Jurassic. More mobile and ecologically plastic marine groups, such as ichthyosaurs, survived the boundary relatively unscathed. High rates of extinction and turnover in other macropredaceous marine groups, including plesiosaurs, are accompanied by the origin of most major lineages of extant sharks. Groups which occupied both marine and terrestrial ecosystems, including crocodylomorphs, document a selective extinction in shallow marine forms, whereas turtles appear to have diversified. These patterns suggest that different extinction selectivity and ecological processes were operating between marine and terrestrial ecosystems, which were ultimately important in determining the fates of many key groups, as well as the origins of many major extant lineages. We identify a series of potential abiotic candidates for driving these patterns, including multiple bolide impacts, several episodes of flood basalt eruptions, dramatic climate change, and major disruptions to oceanic systems. The J/K transition therefore, although not a mass extinction, represents an important transitional period in the co‐evolutionary history of life on Earth.

Highlights

  • An emerging picture of this interval indicates that it was a time of elevated extinction in marine invertebrate faunas (Hallam, 1986; Alroy, 2010a), coinciding with a faunal turnover in low-latitude, shallow marine faunas (Aberhan, Kiessling & Fursich, 2006; Klompmaker et al, 2013)

  • Whether or not there was a mass extinction at the J/K boundary is a multi-faceted issue, and occluded by the relatively poor sampling and dating of earliest Cretaceous fossil-bearing deposits (Fig. 5), as well as the different approaches used in its historical investigation

  • For marine tetrapod groups in particular, it appears that the J/K interval represents a staggered cascade model of extinction, with different groups responding in a variety of ways to a range of ecological perturbations, and with fluctuations in sea level possibly acting as the principal driver of change (Hallam & Wignall, 1999)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous interval (164–100 Ma) represents a transitional period in the history of life on Earth, coeval with significant environmental fluctuations and changes in Earth systems processes (Hallam, 1986; Ogg & Lowrie, 1986; Weissert & Mohr, 1996; Hart et al, 1997; Grocke et al, 2003; Weissert & Erba, 2004; Zorina et al, 2008; Sager et al, 2013). Accompanying the Shatsky volcanism, and coincident with ongoing Gondwanan fragmentation (Wignall, 2001; Segev, 2002), was a host of mantle plume-related and smaller-scale volcanic activity (Fig. 3) These include: (i) 10–20 km thick sequences in the Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Chile (Vergara et al, 1995); (ii) evidence for a plume event (Wilson & Guiraud, 1998) recorded in the Oxfordian deposits of northern Brazil (Baksi & Archibald, 1997), north-east Africa (Segev, 2000), and Western Africa (Maluski et al, 1995), the latter of which continued erupting into the Valanginian–Hauterivian; (iii) plume-associated activity from the J/K boundary of the Liberian margin (Garfunkel, 1998) and the Equatorial Atlantic (southern India, northern South Africa, southeast Australia, the Antarctic peninsula, and Patagonia), concurrent with the final stage of the Karoo igneous province Floral groups in Australia (and associated landmasses) and Antarctica appear to have been unaffected at the J/K boundary, based on currently available data, any species-level effect is unknown (Dettmann, 1989)

DISCUSSION
(4) Summary
CONCLUSIONS
Findings
VIII. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call