Abstract
Design of biomedical sensors and probes are limited by failure analysis tools that are unable to prediction product life, partially due to the absence of time-dependant materials property databases. “Design for reliability” lags “test for reliability,” thus less than optimal product designs reach the market. Regulatory agencies have identified several critical path design projects that could alleviate the situation. An argument is made that design standards are the province of Industry and an initiative for collaboration on pre-competitive material design data should be undertaken.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.