Abstract

The biomechanics and function of fresh porcine aortic roots and valves have been compared with those of glutaraldehyde-treated roots prepared in a conventional manner without dilation of the elastic aortic root and with glutaraldehyde-treated roots prepared with permanent predilation during fixation. The glutaraldehyde-treated aortic walls were significantly less extensible than fresh walls, with a mean dilation of only 6% compared with 45% for the fresh root at 120 mm Hg pressure. Permanent predilation of the aortic root during fixation allowed the total dilation of the fixed root to be increased to 19% at 120 mm Hg pressure. The effective orifice area of the fresh root and valve was significantly greater than those of the fixed roots and valves, with permanent predilation fixation producing a significantly greater orifice area than conventional fixation. The open-leaflet bending deformations were found to be lower in the valves fixed after permanent predilation than in the standard fixed valves. The glutaraldehyde-treated porcine root and valve does not reproduce the biomechanics and function of the fresh/root, because of the reduced extensibility of the fixed aortic wall. Permanent predilation during fixation helps to partially overcome the shortcomings of the fixed root, producing better function than a standard fixed valve.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.