Biomechanical study of the stability of posterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation: a finite element analysis

Abstract

BackgroundPosterior cervical expansive open-door laminoplasty (EODL) may cause postoperative C5 palsy, and it can be avoided by EODL with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy. However, prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy can compromise cervical spine stability. To prevent postoperative C5 palsy and boost cervical stability, We propose a new operation method: EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation. However, there are no studies on the biomechanical properties of this surgery.PurposeEvaluating the biomechanical characteristics of EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation and other three classic surgery.MethodsAn original model (A) and four surgical models (B-E) of the C2-T1 vertebrae of a female patient were constructed. (B) EODL; (C) EODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy; (D) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation; (E) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and C3-6 lateral mass screw system. To compare the biomechanical properties of cervical posterior internal fixation; (E) C3-6 expansive open-door laminoplasty combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and C3-6 lateral mass screw system. To compare the biomechanical properties of cervical posterior internal fixation methods, six physiological motion states were simulated for the five models using a 100N load force and 1.5Nm torque. The biomechanical advantages of the four internal fixation systems were evaluated by comparing the ranges of motion (ROMs) and maximum stresses.Results The overall ROM of Model C outperformed the other four models, reaching a maximum ROM in the extension state of 10.59°±0.04°. Model C showed a significantly higher ROMs of C4/5 segment than other four models. Model D showed a significantly lower ROM of C4/5 segment than both Model B and Model C. Model E showed a significantly lower ROM of C4/5 segment than Model D. The stress in the four surgical models were mainly concentrated on the internal fixation systems.ConclusionEODL combined with bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy and short-segment lateral mass screw fixation can maintain the stability of the spine and has minimal effects on the patient’s cervical spine ROMs in the extension and flexion state. As a result, it may be a promising treatment option for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to prevention of postoperative C5 palsy.