Abstract
Background To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in normal thin (NT) healthy corneas with central corneal thickness (CCT) of 470–500 μm with matched thickness in keratoconus suspect (KCS) and keratoconus (KC) eyes. Methods A total of 103 eyes in three groups were included prospectively: NT, KCS, and KC groups based on clinical examination and Pentacam findings. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured using the ocular response analyzer (ORA). CCT, CH, and CRF were compared between the three groups and statistically analyzed by variance tests. Results The three groups consisted of 44 NT, 26 KCS, and 33 KC. The mean CH measured was 8.689 ± 1.775, 9.051 ± 1.1190, and 8.129 ± 0.8539 mmHg in NT, KCS, and KC eyes, respectively. The mean CRF was 8.441 ± 1.663, 8.337 ± 1.114, and 7.2422 ± 1.3110 mmHg in NT, KCS, and KC eyes, respectively. Within the range of central corneal thickness (470–500 μm), only mean CRF was statistically significantly different between the NT and KC (P < 0.05); there was no statistically significant difference between NT and KCS, nor was the mean CH between each group (P > 0.05). Conclusions CRF only can be helpful in differentiating KC from NT eyes; KCS could not be predicted with either corneal biomechanical metrics. There was no benefit from CH in differentiating between the three study groups.
Highlights
To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in normal thin (NT) healthy corneas with central corneal thickness (CCT) of 470–500 μm with matched thickness in keratoconus suspect (KCS) and keratoconus (KC) eyes
A total of 103 eyes from 58 subjects were enrolled in our study, of which 44 eyes showed normal thin (NT) corneas, Figure 1: Pentacam of the left eye of a patient in group 1
Our results showed that only the mean CRF was significantly lower in KC eyes compared to NT ones, but no significant difference was seen in CCT, CH, and CRF parameters of KCS eyes compared with NT eyes
Summary
To evaluate and compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in normal thin (NT) healthy corneas with central corneal thickness (CCT) of 470–500 μm with matched thickness in keratoconus suspect (KCS) and keratoconus (KC) eyes. Central corneal thickness (CCT) is a biometric factor [1] with a wide range of variability in healthy eyes, the cause of which is believed to result from different amounts of collagen fibrils and interfibrillar substance in the corneal stromal matrix [2]. It is a measure of tissue mass and represents an indicator of corneal rigidity. E ORA has an infrared electrooptical system that monitors corneal deformations It delivers a precisely metered collimated air pulse to the eye. Corneal hysteresis (CH) is the difference between these two pressure values, which represents the corneal viscoelastic damping
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary 
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
