Abstract

Relevance. Currently, the stability of various options for the fixation of sacral fractures by the finite element method has not been sufficiently studied.Purpose — the biomechanical characteristics of two variants of internal fixation of unilateral sacral fractures by various implants and the localization of the line of its fracture with respect to the articular facet of the L5-S1 vertebrae were studied.Materials and Methods. Using the finite element method, we studied the biomechanical characteristics of two options for fixing a one-sided longitudinal fracture of the sacrum with different localization of the line of its fracture: outside, inside and directly on the joint facet L5-S1. Two fixation options are considered: cannulated sacroiliac screws and a similar option in combination with a bilateral lumbar-pelvic transpedicular system.Results. The stresses in implants and bone under compression load and torso forward or backward are almost the same in all models. In the model of fixation with a sacroiliac screw of a one-sided longitudinal sacral fracture, the line of which passes through the articular process S1 of the vertebra (Isler II type), the greatest stress in the screws under compression load and bending moment was 619.7 MPa, which exceeds the yield strength of the titanium alloy and can damage the implants. In all models where the transpedicular system additionally acted as fixing structures, a decrease of 42–77% of maximum displacements was noted, by 28–79% of equivalent stresses in implants under all types of loads, while the equivalent stresses in the bone structures did not differ significantly. In models where the transpedicular system was additionally applied, a decrease of 42–77% of maximum displacements was noted, by 28-79% of stresses in implants under all types of loads, while the stresses in the bones did not differ much.Conclusion. In all cases of localization of the line of unilateral fracture of the sacrum, the use of a transpedicular system in combination with sacroiliac screws is more stable from the point of view of biomechanics. The most unstable is a one-sided longitudinal fracture of the sacrum passing through the facet L5-S1.

Highlights

  • Биомеханическая оценка и сравнительное исследование разных типов фиксации проводятся путем экспериментальных стендовых испытаний на трупах либо методами вычислительного анализа [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]

  • Using the finite element method, we studied the biomechanical characteristics of two options for fixing a one-sided longitudinal fracture of the sacrum with different localization of the line of its fracture: outside, inside and directly on the joint facet L5-S1

  • Manukovsky — Dr Sci (Med.), Professor, Deputy Director, Dzhanelidze St. Рetersburg Research Institute of Emergency Medicine; Professor, Military Field Surgery Chair, Kirov Military Medical Academy, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation

Read more

Summary

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING IN TRAUMA AND ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY

Биомеханическое моделирование вариантов внутренней фиксации односторонних переломов крестца. Цель — оценить биомеханические характеристики двух вариантов систем внутренней фиксации односторонних переломов крестца при различных конфигурациях имплантатов и локализации линии его разлома по отношению к суставной фасетке L5-S1 позвонков. При помощи метода конечных элементов проведена оценка биомеханических характеристик двух вариантов систем фиксации одностороннего продольного перелома крестца при различной локализации линии его разлома: кнаружи, кнутри и непосредственно на суставной фасетке L5-S1 позвонков. В модели фиксации крестцово-подвздошными винтами одностороннего продольного перелома крестца, линия которого проходит через суставной отросток S1 позвонка (тип Isler II), наибольшие показатели величины эквивалентных напряжений в винтах при компрессионной нагрузке и изгибающем моменте составили 619,7 МПа, что превышает предел текучести титанового сплава и может привести к разрушению установленных имплантов. Кажанов И.В., Микитюк С.И., Доль А.В., Иванов Д.В., Харламов А.В., Петров А.В., Коссович Л.Ю., Мануковский В.А.

Материал и методы
Титановый сплав
Вариант фиксации
Клинический пример
Findings
Вклад авторов
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call