Abstract

BackgroundCervical spondylotic radiculopathy is a common spinal disease. The traditional surgical treatment consists of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), but it presents problems such as trauma and fusion complications. Percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) is a new minimally invasive technology that has produced good clinical outcome, but further biomechanical comparisons are needed to guide the clinical work. The goal of this study was to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the two methods by finite element analysis.MethodOn the basis of the computed tomography scanning data of five cases of cervical spondylosis after PPECD surgery, five cases after ACDF surgery, and five non-surgical patients, software (Mimics 15.0, HyperMesh 12.0, and Abaqus 6.13) was adopted to establish a C1–C7 segment 3D finite element model. We also applied 50 N vertical load on the C1 surface and 1.5 Nm torque, simulated the anteflexion, rear protraction, and left and right lateral flexion and rotation, and observed the stability, stress distribution, and Cobb angular change of the surgical section of the cervical vertebra under different working conditions.ResultThe postoperative model under different working conditions demonstrated poorer stability than the non-surgical group, but the stability of the PPECD group was close to that of the non-surgical group. The stability of the ACDF group was the worst, especially when making lateral bending and posterior extension. The ACDF group also showed significant differences. The PPECD group showed uniform stress distribution, whereas the ACDF group was under large stress, which was primarily concentrated in the internal fixation system. In addition, the implant showed the potential for fracture. The Cobb angle of surgery section of the PPECD group was smaller than that of the ACDF group, and the stability of the section was good.ConclusionFrom the perspective of finite element analysis, the cervical vertebrae after PPECD treatment showed good biomechanical performance and stability.

Highlights

  • Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is a common spinal disease

  • Cervical intervertebral fusion developed to anterior cervical decompression and fusion, and this technology has been demonstrated to be safe and effective [5]

  • A comparison of postoperative posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) biomechanics with Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) after the treatment of nerve-root cervical spondylosis was conducted to compare the biomechanical features of the two procedures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cervical spondylotic radiculopathy is a common spinal disease. The traditional surgical treatment consists of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), but it presents problems such as trauma and fusion complications. In a random comparison study on the treatment of 175 cases of nerve-root type cervical spondylosis by percutaneous posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) and anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), with 2 years of follow-up, Ruetten et al [15] reached a remarkable achievement ratio of 87.4% after PPECD treatment. This result demonstrated that PPECD is a safe and effective replacement of traditional ACDF technology. A comparison of postoperative PPECD biomechanics with ACDF after the treatment of nerve-root cervical spondylosis was conducted to compare the biomechanical features of the two procedures

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call