Biomechanical comparison of different fixation methods in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: a cadaver study

Abstract

BackgroundVarious fixation methods are available for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: nail, plate, or screws. An intramedullary bone stabilization system within a balloon catheter has not previously been used in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of these techniques.MethodsTwenty-four lower legs from fresh-frozen human cadavers were used. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis was performed with a retrograde nail, a lateral locking plate, three cancellous screws, or an intramedullary bone stabilization system. The ankles were loaded cyclically in plantarflexion and dorsiflexion.ResultsFor cyclic loading at 125 N, the mean range of motion was 1.7 mm for nail, 2.2 mm for plate, 6.0 mm for screws, and 9.0 mm for the bone stabilization system (P < .01). For cyclic loading at 250 N, the mean range of motion was 4.4 mm for nail, 7.5 mm for plate, 12.1 mm for screws, and 14.6 mm for the bone stabilization system (P < .01). The mean cycle of failure was 4191 for nail, 3553 for plate, 3725 for screws, and 2132 for the bone stabilization system (P = .10).ConclusionsThe stability of the tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis differs depending on the fixation method, with nail or plate showing the greatest stability and the bone stabilization system the least. When three screws are used for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis, the stability is intermediate. As the biomechanical stability of the bone stabilization system is low, it cannot be recommended for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis.