Abstract
Abstract. Despite efforts to discern the role of plant size in resource competition, the circumstances under which size-dependent plant-plant interactions occur are still unclear. The traditional assumption is that competition intensifies with increasing neighbour size. However, recent studies suggest that the size (biomass) dependence of competitive interactions is strongest at very low biomass levels and becomes negligible after a certain threshold neighbour biomass has been reached. We searched for the generality of such patterns for three common annual plant species in Israel. We monitored target and neighbour biomass along their entire lifecycle using an even-aged, intraspecific and intrapopulation competition screenhouse experiment under water-limited conditions. For all focal species, neighbour presence had a net negative effect on vegetative biomass at harvest. However, this was not explained by increasing neighbour biomass over time, as a consistent pattern of size-dependent facilitative, rather than competitive, interactions was observed at all life stages. We explain these observations in terms of co-occurring aboveground facilitation and dominant belowground competition for water. Since our findings are the first of their kind and contradict theoretical predictions of biomass dependence of net negative interactions, we advocate further experiments addressing size dependence in interactions among plants. In particular, theoretical models addressing size dependence of positive interactions must be developed.
Highlights
The importance of competition for determining structure and function of plant populations and communities has long been recognized
We present experimental evidence for such shifts from an experiment in which we monitored the relationship between neighbour biomass and competition intensity along the lifecycle of three annual plant species
Neighbour presence reduced the final biomass of target individuals of B. didyma, S. capensis and H. circinnatus by 25 %, 30 % and 37 %, respectively
Summary
The importance of competition for determining structure and function of plant populations and communities has long been recognized. The role of plant size in resource competition has been approached from theoretical and experimental angles. Studies of competitive symmetry have shown that larger size may confer a disproportionate advantage for resource preemption (reviews in Weiner, 1990; Casper and Jackson, 1997; Schwinning and Weiner, 1998) which can affect the size distribution of individuals in crowded populations Grime, 1979; Tilman, 1982) Common to these theories is the implicit assumption of a positive relationship between total plant biomass (size) and resource uptake It has been assumed that competition intensity is positively related to the size or biomass of the interacting individuals. Competition should intensify through time as plants grow and increase their resource uptake (i.e. from small seedlings to adults)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.