Abstract

Abstract. Smoke from wildfires is a significant source of air pollution, which can adversely impact air quality and ecosystems downwind. With the recently increasing intensity and severity of wildfires, the threat to air quality is expected to increase. Satellite-derived biomass burning emissions can fill in gaps in the absence of aircraft or ground-based measurement campaigns and can help improve the online calculation of biomass burning emissions as well as the biomass burning emissions inventories that feed air quality models. This study focuses on satellite-derived NOx emissions using the high-spatial-resolution TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) NO2 dataset. Advancements and improvements to the satellite-based determination of forest fire NOx emissions are discussed, including information on plume height and effects of aerosol scattering and absorption on the satellite-retrieved vertical column densities. Two common top-down emission estimation methods, (1) an exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) and (2) a flux method, are applied to synthetic data to determine the accuracy and the sensitivity to different parameters, including wind fields, satellite sampling, noise, lifetime, and plume spread. These tests show that emissions can be accurately estimated from single TROPOMI overpasses. The effect of smoke aerosols on TROPOMI NO2 columns (via air mass factors, AMFs) is estimated, and these satellite columns and emission estimates are compared to aircraft observations from four different aircraft campaigns measuring biomass burning plumes in 2018 and 2019 in North America. Our results indicate that applying an explicit aerosol correction to the TROPOMI NO2 columns improves the agreement with the aircraft observations (by about 10 %–25 %). The aircraft- and satellite-derived emissions are in good agreement within the uncertainties. Both top-down emissions methods work well; however, the EMG method seems to output more consistent results and has better agreement with the aircraft-derived emissions. Assuming a Gaussian plume shape for various biomass burning plumes, we estimate an average NOx e-folding time of 2 ±1 h from TROPOMI observations. Based on chemistry transport model simulations and aircraft observations, the net emissions of NOx are 1.3 to 1.5 times greater than the satellite-derived NO2 emissions. A correction factor of 1.3 to 1.5 should thus be used to infer net NOx emissions from the satellite retrievals of NO2.

Highlights

  • Wildfires are a significant source of aerosols and trace gases in the global atmosphere (Andreae, 2019, and references therein)

  • Our study explores the derivation of top-down NOx emissions from wildfires using TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) NO2 observations and assesses its accuracies, with a focus on (1) the methods used for the emission estimates, (2) the conversion of retrieved NO2 to estimates of NOx, (3) the explicit aerosol correction, and (4) validation of the TROPOMI-derived emissions using aircraft observations

  • Tropospheric NO2 vertical column densities (VCDs), measured by TROPOMI, represent the NO2 molecules per unit area between the surface and the tropopause. These tropospheric NO2 VCDs are estimated by a three-step approach: (1) slant column densities (SCDs, in units of mol/m2) are retrieved from the spectra using differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS; Platt and Stutz, 2008); (2) the stratospheric contribution is separated, using a chemistry transport model (Boersma et al, 2004) from the SCDs to obtain a tropospheric SCDs; and (3) the tropospheric SCDs are converted to tropospheric VCDs by applying an air mass factor (AMF)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wildfires are a significant source of aerosols and trace gases in the global atmosphere (Andreae, 2019, and references therein). We compare the TROPOMI NO2 vertical column densities (VCDs) and emission estimates to those obtained by four different aircraft campaigns in the western United States and Canada during the 2018 and 2019 summers: (1) Environment and Climate Change Canada’s 2018 aircraft campaign over the Athabasca Oil Sands Region (AOSR) (Griffin et al, 2019; Ditto et al, 2021; McLagan et al, 2021), (2) the Western Wildfire Experiment for Cloud Chemistry, Aerosol Absorption and Nitrogen (WE-CAN; https://www.eol.ucar.edu/field_projects/we-can, last access: 19 July 2021) campaign, (3) the Biomass Burning Fluxes of Trace Gases and Aerosols (BB-FLUX) campaign (Theys et al, 2020; Kille et al, 2021), and (4) the Fire Influence on Regional to Global Environments Experiment – Air Quality

TROPOMI
GEM-MACH
Aircraft data
ECCC aircraft campaign over the AOSR
BB-FLUX
WE-CAN
FIREX-AQ
AMF with explicit aerosol correction
Methods for estimating emissions from satellite data
Flux method
Exponentially modified Gaussian
Accuracy of the emission estimates using synthetic data
Lifetime and plume spread
Reproducing the synthetic emissions
NO2-to-NOx scaling
Total uncertainties of the NOx emission estimate
Comparison to aircraft measurements
Integrated profiles
Emission comparisons
DOAS comparison
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.