Biomarkers in early and late period after radiofrequency and pulsed field catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Biomarkers are routinely used parameters for disease diagnosis, treatment control and risk stratification. In connection with atrial fibrillation (AF), the importance of GDF-15 (growth differentiation factor 15), NT-proBNP (N-terminal fragment brain natriuretic factor) and hs-TnT (high sensitivity cardiac troponin T) is discussed. Catheter ablation is an established treatment method in selected population with AF. However, biomarker response to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) and pulsed field ablation (PFA) of AF has not been precisely described. Purpose Purpose of the study was to describe early and late dynamics of GDF-15, hs-TnT and NT-proBNP in different ablation technologies. Methods We prospectively enrolled 48 patients (median (IQR) age 62 (55; 70) years, 30 males) undergoing RFCA, which we compared with 30 patients (median (IQR) age 64 (56; 71) years, 18 males) undergoing PFA. All patients underwent 6 sequential blood takes: before ablation (baseline), right after ablation (0h), 24 and 48 hours after procedure (24h and 48h), 90 and 180 days after procedure. Levels of GDF-15, hs-TnT and NT-proBNP were analyzed. Results Out of all patients, 19 (40 %) and 20 (67 %) patients had paroxysmal AF in RFCA and PFA group, respectively. Additional ablation lesions over pulmonary vein isolation were done in 26 (54 %) patients in RFCA group and 11 (43 %) patients in PFA group. Median procedural time was significantly longer in RFCA than in PFA group (155 (130; 190) vs. 80 (70; 90) min; p < 0.01). Early dynamics of GDF-15 and cardiac hs-TnT are visualised in Figure 1 and 2. GDF-15 level peak was registered 48 hours after ablation with median (IQR) 1183 (824; 1988) ng/l. Compared to baseline, GDF-15 values sustained elevated up to 90 days after ablation in both groups and decreased to baseline levels after 180 days. No significant differences were found in GDF-15 levels between patients treated with RFCA and PFA. Maximal values of hs-TnT were significantly higher in PFA group than in RFCA group (1001±589 vs. 458±202 ng/l; p < 0.001). We have recognised decrease of NT-proBNP between baseline and 90 days after procedure in both groups: 338 (112; 613) vs. 209 (101; 545) ng/l; p < 0.05. Conclusion Eventhough GDF-15 is considered as a nonspecific biomarker reflecting general condition of patient, the levels are significantly affected by catheter ablation of AF for several months irrespective to ablation technology. PFA is associated with advanced elevation of hs-TnT.Dynamics of GDF-15 (median; IQR)Dynamics of hs-TnT (median; IQR)