Abstract
Abstract INTRODUCTION Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy induces clinical responses in a subset of glioblastoma (GBM) patients. We previously reported that ERK1/2 phosphorylation (p-ERK) in pre-treatment tumor samples is predictive of overall survival (OS) following adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy in two independent cohorts of recurrent GBM patients. METHODS Following the Remark criteria for biomarker validation, we investigated p-ERK as a predictive of OS in 24 evaluable tumor samples of recurrent GBM patients from a clinical trial. These patients underwent intracerebral administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors as part of a phase I clinical trial where intracerebral administration of ipilimumab (10 mg) or ipilimumab (5 mg) and nivolumab (10 mg) followed by postsurgical intravenous nivolumab (10 mg) was evaluated (NCT03233152; Duerinck J, et al. JITC, 2021). We quantified cell density of p-ERK+ cells in tumor regions. For exploratory purposes, patients were divided in 3 groups (n=8 per group) bases on p-ERK cell density. RESULTS We observed an incremental OS with high p-ERK GBM patients exhibiting a median OS of 81.6 weeks (95% CI 33.86-NA), intermediate p-ERK median OS of 43.1 weeks (95% CI 33.14-NA), and low p-ERK group with a median OS of 19.3 weeks (95% CI 16.14-NA). A Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for age and IDH mutant status showed a trend for p-ERK association with favorable OS (HR= 0.77, 95% CI 0.6-=1.01, P=0.056). CONCLUSIONS While the number of patients analyzed is relatively small, this study suggests the potential predictive power of p-ERK in an independent prospective GBM cohort treated with an alternative and unique administration approach of immune checkpoint blockade.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.