BIOM-16. LONGITUDINAL GLIOMA CEREBROSPINAL FLUID CELL-FREE DNA FOR MONITORING AND TREATMENT RESPONSE ASSESSMENT

Abstract

Abstract Few methods exist via which to assess treatment response with high fidelity in gliomas. While CSF has previously been used as a source of cfDNA, it remains unknown how cfDNA abundance and sequencing changes throughout treatment and inevitable recurrence in gliomas. We utilized our biobank of longitudinal intracranial CSF specimens to determine the potential utility of CSF cfDNA as a monitoring tool for treatment response in patients with gliomas. Longitudinal CSF specimens were acquired via Ommaya reservoirs (NCT04692337) or ventriculoperitoneal shunts (NCT04692324) in patients with gliomas. cfDNA was extracted from 1-5 mL of CSF, and next-Generation sequencing or low-pass whole genome sequencing (LPWGS) was performed by Predicine, Inc. CSF acquired prior to versus after resection demonstrated an increase in quantified cfDNA (2.97x, range: 1.58-5.26x), consistent with the impact of increased parenchymal disruption and closer contact with CSF. Thereafter, CSF cfDNA continued to decrease throughout chemoradiation and adjuvant treatment and increased at recurrence, including in patients co-enrolled in immunotherapy trials for IL-7 agonists and pembrolizumab. Copy number burden (CNB) increased by the time of recurrence in three patients with known disease progression, and continued to decrease throughout immunotherapy treatment in one patient despite concerns of pseudoprogression. In one patient with a hypermutated glioblastoma, CSF cfDNA revealed over 59 genomic alterations, including MAP2K1, KIT, and PDGFRA, excluding even more variants of unknown significance, each of which had been detected in sequencing of the tissue acquired at resection and subsequently decreased with chemoradiation. In another patient with a known progressing EGFR-amplified GBM, over 200 new variants were identified by the patient’s final sample and EGFR copy number increased from 2 to over 30. In conclusion, cfDNA analysis over a patient’s disease course, including resection and treatment with standard-of-care and experimental therapies, may be of use for disease monitoring and treatment response.