Abstract

BackgroundThere is currently a lack of reliable information on the exposures of residents and bystanders to pesticides in the UK. Previous research has shown that the methods currently used for assessing pesticide exposure for regulatory purposes are appropriate for farm workers [1]. However, there were indications that the exposures of bystanders may sometimes be underestimated. The previous study did not collect data for residents. Therefore, this study aims to collect measurements to determine if the current methods and tools are appropriate for assessing pesticide exposure for residents living near agricultural fields.Methods/designThe study will recruit owners of farms and orchards (hereafter both will be referred to as farms) that spray their agricultural crops with certain specified pesticides, and which have residential areas in close proximity to these fields. Recruited farms will be asked to provide details of their pesticide usage throughout the spray season. Informed consenting residents (adults (18 years and over) and children (aged 4-12 years)) will be asked to provide urine samples and accompanying activity diaries during the spraying season and in addition for a limited number of weeks before/after the spray season to allow background pesticide metabolite levels to be determined. Selected urine samples will be analysed for the pesticide metabolites of interest. Statistical analysis and mathematical modelling will use the laboratory results, along with the additional data collected from the farmers and residents, to determine systemic exposure levels amongst residents. Surveys will be carried out in selected areas of the United Kingdom over two years (2011 and 2012), covering two spraying seasons and the time between the spraying seasons.DiscussionThe described study protocol was implemented for the sample and data collection procedures carried out in 2011. Based on experience to date, no major changes to the protocol are anticipated for the 2012 spray season although the pesticides and regional areas for inclusion in 2012 are still to be confirmed.

Highlights

  • There is currently a lack of reliable information on the exposures of residents and bystanders to pesticides in the UK

  • The described study protocol was implemented for the sample and data collection procedures carried out in 2011

  • Based on experience to date, no major changes to the protocol are anticipated for the 2012 spray season the pesticides and regional areas for inclusion in 2012 are still to be confirmed

Read more

Summary

Discussion

This study protocol was implemented for the 2011 sample and data collection procedures. Acknowledgements and funding The research team would like to thank the community researchers Julie Cadzow, Fiona Maciver and Daphne Dahrendorf for their contribution to the project team and implementation of the study protocol in the data and sample collection. We would like to thank the project Advisory Committee Group members (Professor Len Levy, Professor David Coggon, Dr Sean Semple and Mr Paul Hamey) for their helpful comments and suggestions, which led to improvements in the study protocol. Authors’ contributions KG is the project leader, the lead author responsible for the drafting and completion of the research protocol and for the drafting of this manuscript. LM and PT contributed to the development of the protocol and study design as members of the research team. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests

Background
Methods
Findings
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call