Biological control of aphids and coccids: a comparative analysis

Abstract

AbstractA comparison of the biological control of aphids and coccids was carried out by analyzing success rates for the three major types of biological control, i.e., classical, augmentative, and conservational. Because of the higher intrinsic rates of increase for aphids versus coccids, the working hypothesis that biological control of aphids is less successful compared to coccids was adopted. However, this hypothesis was not supported by an analysis of classical biological control using the BIOCAT database. In this analysis, parasitoids were more successful than predators when used against either aphids or coccids, but the control of Icerya spp. with Rodolia spp. (predators) was highly successful. Some reasons for success of Rodolia spp. are adduced, but field studies on the long‐term population dynamics of Icerya–Rodolia systems are needed for determining the mechanisms of regulation. Comparative analyses of augmentative and conservational biological control of aphids and coccids were inconclusive, due to lack of adequate databases; some possible factors involved in the success of these types of biological control are discussed. It is suggested that parasitoids could be better control agents than predators in augmentative biological control of aphids in production greenhouses. Conservational biological control of either aphids or coccids should be aimed at enhancing populations of indigenous natural enemies, especially mobile generalist predators that are capable of keeping pace with mobile pests.