Abstract

Background: Sumilarv 0.5G (Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) is a granular insecticide developed for the control of mosquito and fly aquatic stages. The active ingredient is pyriproxyfen (4-phenoxyphenyl (RS)-2-(2 – pyridyloxy) propyl ether), a juvenile hormone analogue that acts as an insect growth regulator. Sumilarv 0.5G functions by inhibition of adult emergence from pupae. In this study, the Tropical Pesticides Research Institute in Tanzania carried out laboratory, semifield, and full-field evaluation on a new candidate of pupicide, Sumilarv 0.5G. The present study, therefore, sought to test the bioefficacy of Sumilarv 0.5G in laboratory, semifield, and full-field conditions in Mabogini, northern Tanzania. Methods: Standard World Health Organization laboratory bioefficacy evaluations of Sumilarv 0.5G and untreated microcosms were prepared and monitored for inhibition of the larvae introduced to the habitats, while field plots were monitored for 5 weeks after the introduction of Sumilarv 0.5G using manufacturer-recommended doses. Results: Sumilarv 0.5G biolarvicide was highly efficacious in its pupicidal effect, with an adult emergence inhibition rate of up to 90% in all conditions. In both laboratory and semifield experiments, the emergence inhibition was dose-dependent, with the lowest adult emergence being recorded in association with the highest Sumilarv 0.5G dose of 0.03 ppm of active ingredient. Under field conditions, the application rate recommended by the manufacturer – 5 mg ai per m2 – reduced the adult emergence rate by 90% to 96% for up to 5 weeks. Conclusion: We demonstrated the long-lasting biological activity of Sumilarv 0.5G under field conditions. Notably, the field efficacy was attained using the recommended dose of 5 mg per m2, thus making it economical to apply this product, which is capable of inhibiting mosquito productivity in natural habitats for longer periods than achieved by existing products, the efficacy of which is usually about 1 week.

Highlights

  • This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Sumilarv 0.5G as a pupicide against An. gambiae s.s. in laboratory and semifield conditions, and against An. arabiensis under field conditions

  • Our findings shown that wild An. arabiensis and laboratory An. gambiae s.s. populations had similar responses to Sumilarv 0.5G under different environmental conditions

  • Sumilarv 0.5G inhibited over 90% of the total adult emergence over a period of 5 weeks in irrigated rice fields at an application rate of 5 mg ai per m2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Africa, the main malaria vectors are members of Anopheles gambiae sibling species complex and the Anopheles funestus complex.[1,2] The An. gambiae complex consists of An. gambiae sensu stricto (s.s.), Anopheles arabiensis, Anopheles merus, Anopheles melus, Anopheles bambwae, Anopheles colluzzii, and Anopheles ahmaricus.[1,2] The An. funestus complex vectors are An. funestus s.s., Anopheles leesoni, Anopheles rivulorum, and Anopheles vaneedeni.[3,4,5,6,7,8] The main frontline malaria vector control tools are long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying (IRS).[9]. Methods: Standard World Health Organization laboratory bioefficacy evaluations of Sumilarv 0.5G and untreated microcosms were prepared and monitored for inhibition of the larvae introduced to the habitats, while field plots were monitored for 5 weeks after the introduction of Sumilarv 0.5G using manufacturer-recommended doses. Results: Sumilarv 0.5G biolarvicide was highly efficacious in its pupicidal effect, with an adult emergence inhibition rate of up to 90% in all conditions. In both laboratory and semifield experiments, the emergence inhibition was dose-dependent, with the lowest adult emergence being recorded in association with the highest Sumilarv 0.5G dose of 0.03 ppm of active ingredient. The field efficacy was attained using the recommended dose of 5 mg per m2, making it economical to apply this product, which is capable of inhibiting mosquito productivity in natural habitats for longer periods than achieved by existing products, the efficacy of which is usually about 1 week

Objectives
Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call