Abstract

Amazonian rivers are usually suggested as dispersal barriers, limiting biogeographic units. This is evident in a widely accepted Areas of Endemism (AoEs) hypothesis proposed for Amazonian birds. We empirically test this hypothesis based on quantitative analyses of species distribution. We compiled a database of bird species and subspecies distribution records, and used this dataset to identify AoEs through three different methods. Our results show that the currently accepted Amazonian AoEs are not consistent with areas identified, which were generally congruent among datasets and methods. Some Amazonian rivers represent limits of AoEs, but these areas are not congruent with those previously proposed. However, spatial variation in species composition is correlated with largest Amazonian rivers. Overall, the previously proposed Amazonian AoEs are not consistent with the evidence from bird distribution. However, the fact that major rivers coincide with breaks in species composition suggest they can act as dispersal barriers, though not necessarily for all bird taxa. This scenario indicates a more complex picture of the Amazonian bird distribution than previously imagined.

Highlights

  • Amazonian rivers are usually suggested as dispersal barriers, limiting biogeographic units

  • Our tests of the interfluve hypothesis were based on two datasets, one composed by distribution records of 612 Amazonian bird subspecies and another in which subspecies were merged within species, comprising records of 566 species

  • The Parsimony Analysis of Endemicity (PAE), identifies Areas of Endemism (AoEs) based on a cladistic analysis of grid cells, with species as characters, to identify clusters of grid cells that are interpreted as AoEs26

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Amazonian rivers are usually suggested as dispersal barriers, limiting biogeographic units This is evident in a widely accepted Areas of Endemism (AoEs) hypothesis proposed for Amazonian birds. We empirically test this hypothesis based on quantitative analyses of species distribution. The fact that major rivers coincide with breaks in species composition suggest they can act as dispersal barriers, though not necessarily for all bird taxa This scenario indicates a more complex picture of the Amazonian bird distribution than previously imagined. A more recent proposition, based on bird distribution data, emerged as part of the Pleistocene forest refuge hypothesis[2], which identified four “centers of distribution” Both hypotheses were based on a general notion that the Amazon’s large rivers could act as dispersal barriers, generating the current distribution patterns of the Amazonian Biota. It is fair to say that the currently recognized Amazonian AoEs still require quantitative support

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call