Biogeochemical consequences of the transformation of native Cerrado into Pinus caribaea plantations in Brazil

Abstract

Under the same climatic and edaphic conditions, native savanna vegetation in Brazil, the Cerrado, shows a lower stature and canopy cover than planted Pinus caribaea Morelet forests. To assess the differences in biogeochemical element cycling we compared the nutrient economy of Cerrado and Pinus on three replicate plots of each forest type. The mean nutrient storage in the soil organic layer under Pinus (N: 2630; P: 141; K: 103; Ca: 131; Mg: 20 kg ha−1) was substantially higher than under Cerrado (N: 23; P: 1.2; K: 0.83; Ca: 5.8; Mg: 1.0 kg ha−1) probably because the Pinus roots explored a larger soil volume. The Pinus trees had a higher nutrient-use efficiency as indicated by higher mean litter mass per unit nutrient in litter (N: 108; P: 2290; K: 729; Ca: 1360; Mg: 5420; S: 1190; Fe: 2960; Mn: 9990, Zn: 145000) than the Cerrado trees (N: 94; P: 1810; K: 619; Ca: 302; Mg: 938, S: 746; Fe: 1800; Mn: 7880; Zn: 63700). Mean annual small litterfall collected in 0.25-m2 samplers between May 1997 and April 1999 was 2.1 Mg ha−1 in Cerrado and 7.8 in Pinus. The litterfall rates of the 1–3 week collection intervals correlated negatively with the soil matric potential indicating that litterfall was partly related to water stress. The fluxes of N (73 kg ha−1 year−1), P (3.7), K (11), S (7.0), and Mn (0.83) to the soil with litterfall under Pinus were greater than the litterfall+turnover of the grass/herbs layer under Cerrado (N: 39, P: 2.8, K: 8.6, S: 5.4, Mn: 0.79 kg ha−1 year−1), those of Zn (0.06–0.07) were similar, and those of Ca (Pinus: 5.9/Cerrado: 10), Mg (1.5/4.4), and Fe (2.9/4.0) were smaller. Mean residence times of the organic matter and of all elements were longer in the soil organic layer under Pinus (3.7–26 years in the Oi horizon, 8.1–907 years in the whole organic layer) than under Cerrado (0.22–3.6 years in the Oi horizon, the only organic horizon under Cerrado). Our results demonstrate that the main differences in biogeochemical element cycling between the Pinus forest and the Cerrado consisted of a larger nutrient storage in the organic layer, a higher nutrient-use efficiency, and slower nutrient release rates from the organic layer in the Pinus forest than in the Cerrado. Nutrient cycling as assessed by the nutrient fluxes with litterfall was only partly faster in the Pinus forest than in the Cerrado.