Abstract

A series of pilot-scale studies were performed to compare conventional high-rate activated sludge systems (HRAS) (continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) and plug flow (PF) reactor configurations) with high-rate contact-stabilization (CS) technology in terms of carbon recovery potential from chemically enhanced primary treatment effluent at a municipal wastewater treatment plant. This study showed that carbon redirection and recovery could be achieved at short solids retention time (SRT). However, bioflocculation became a limiting factor in the conventional HRAS configurations (total SRT ≤ 1.2 days). At a total SRT ≤1.1 day, the high-rate CS configuration allowed better carbon removal (52–59%), carbon redirection to sludge (0.46–0.55 g COD/g CODadded) and carbon recovery potential (0.33–0.34 gCOD/gCODadded) than the CSTR and PF configurations (28–37% COD removal, carbon redirection of 0.32–0.45 g COD/g CODadded and no carbon harvesting). The presence of a stabilization phase (famine), achieved by aerating the return activated sludge (RAS), followed by low dissolved oxygen contact with the influent (feast) was identified as the main reason for improved biosorption capacity, bioflocculation and settleability in the CS configuration. This study showed that high-rate CS is a promising technology for carbon and energy recovery from low-strength wastewaters.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.