Abstract

BioEssaysVolume 37, Issue 1 Cover PictureFree Access BioEssays 1∕2015 First published: 17 December 2014 https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201470011AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Graphical Abstract Histone Proteolysis: A proposal for categorization into ‘Clipping’ and ‘Degradation’. On pages 70–79 of this issue, Dhaenens et al. try to cast a new light onto the black box of 40 years of incoherent reports on histone proteolysis. The difficulties of specifying the in vivo versus in vitro origin of this post-translational modification, the fact that the same enzymes mediate both “histone degradation” and the epigenetically connoted “histone clipping”, and the complexity and redundancy of the histone code, all contribute to the surprising shortage of reports on the biology of this potentially far-reaching posttranslational modification. Cover design: Tim De Vocht (based on artwork from David S. Goodsell). Volume37, Issue1January 2015 RelatedInformation

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.