Abstract

Twice‐daily sustained‐release (SR) paracetamol (acetaminophen) offers convenient administration to chronic users. This study investigated at steady state (during the last 24 hours of a 3‐day dosing period) the pharmacokinetics, bioequivalence, and safety of twice‐daily SR paracetamol compared with extended‐release (ER) and immediate‐release (IR) paracetamol. In this open‐label, randomized, multidose, 3‐way crossover study, 28 healthy subjects received paracetamol SR (2 × 1000 mg twice daily), ER (2 × 665 mg 3 times daily), and IR (2 × 500 mg 4 times daily). At steady state, twice‐daily SR paracetamol was bioequivalent to ER and IR paracetamol. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of geometric means were within the acceptance interval for SR/ER paracetamol (AUC0–t, 0.973–1.033; AUC0–24, 0.974–1.034; AUC0–∞, 0.948–1.011; Cmax, 1.082–1.212; Cav, 1.011–1.106) and SR/IR paracetamol (AUC0–t, 0.969–1.029; AUC0–24, 0.968–1.027; AUC0–∞, 0.963–1.026; Cmax, 0.902–1.010; Cav, 1.004–1.098). Given twice daily, the SR formulation demonstrated SR properties as expected. Mean time at or above a 4 μg/mL plasma concentration of paracetamol from 2 daily doses of the SR formulation was significantly longer than that from 4 daily doses of IR paracetamol. SR formulation also had a greater Tmax, a longer half‐life, and lower Cmin compared with ER and IR paracetamol. All formulations were well tolerated.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.