Abstract

Algae (including eukaryotic microalgae and cyanobacteria) have been genetically engineered to convert light and carbon dioxide to many industrially and commercially relevant chemicals including biofuels, materials, and nutritional products. At industrial scale, genetically engineered algae may be cultivated outdoors in open ponds or in closed photobioreactors. In either case, industry would need to address a potential risk of the release of the engineered algae into the natural environment, resulting in potential negative impacts to the environment. Genetic biocontainment strategies are therefore under development to reduce the probability that these engineered bacteria can survive outside of the laboratory or industrial setting. These include active strategies that aim to kill the escaped cells by expression of toxic proteins, and passive strategies that use knockouts of native genes to reduce fitness outside of the controlled environment of labs and industrial cultivation systems. Several biocontainment strategies have demonstrated escape frequencies below detection limits. However, they have typically done so in carefully controlled experiments which may fail to capture mechanisms of escape that may arise in the more complex natural environment. The selection of biocontainment strategies that can effectively kill cells outside the lab, while maintaining maximum productivity inside the lab and without the need for relatively expensive chemicals will benefit from further attention.

Highlights

  • Genetic modification of algae, including eukaryotic microalgae and cyanobacteria, is expected to facilitate direct conversion of light energy and inorganic carbon to a wide variety of valuable chemicals (Angermayr et al, 2015; Gomaa et al, 2016; Santos-Merino et al, 2019; Arora et al, 2020)

  • We examine whether lab tests, which frequently demonstrate the achievement of meeting the NIH guideline of a 10−8 cell survival rate (USA Department of Health and Human Services: National Institutes of Health, 2019), are truly representative of what may occur if cultures were released into the natural environment

  • We review some details of the permitting process for a pilot plant proposed by the algae biotechnology company, Algenol, in the United States as it has been well documented

Read more

Summary

Biocontainment of Genetically Engineered Algae

Reviewed by: Rahmi Lale, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway Kyle J. Lauersen, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia. Genetic biocontainment strategies are under development to reduce the probability that these engineered bacteria can survive outside of the laboratory or industrial setting. These include active strategies that aim to kill the escaped cells by expression of toxic proteins, and passive strategies that use knockouts of native genes to reduce fitness outside of the controlled environment of labs and industrial cultivation systems. Several biocontainment strategies have demonstrated escape frequencies below detection limits They have typically done so in carefully controlled experiments which may fail to capture mechanisms of escape that may arise in the more complex natural environment.

INTRODUCTION
Overview of Strategies for Genetically Encoded Biocontainment
Types of Lethal Genes
Genetic Instability
Toxic Proteins
Weak autotoxicity
Limited growth
Synthetic Auxotrophy
Findings
Future Directions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call