Abstract
The study of the evolution of abiotic niches can be informative regarding the speciation drivers in a given group. Yet, two factors that could potentially affect niche evolution have seldom been addressed concomitantly, which are biotic interactions and geographical isolation. In this study, we used as a model group the Antillean plant genera Gesneria and Rhytidophyllum (Gesneriaceae) to evaluate the effect of pollinators and geographical isolation on the bioclimatic niche. These genera possess species characterized by interspecific geographical isolation in different islands and are pollinated by different pollinators. Some species are pollinated by hummingbirds, other by bats, while some are more generalists and are pollinated by pollinators from both functional groups. After describing the bioclimatic niches of plant species, we measured niche overlap for species pairs and we fitted Brownian motion and Ornstein–Uhlenbeck (OU) evolution models with multiple evolutionary regimes to test for an effect of pollination strategy or geographical isolation on bioclimatic niche evolution of these plants. The analysis of niche overlap between plant species, which could not be corrected for phylogenetic relationships, showed that it was significantly influenced by pollination mode and island distribution. By contrast, the best fitting evolutionary model on niche optima and tolerance was always an OU model with a unique selective regime, suggesting that neither pollination strategy nor island isolation had an important effect on bioclimatic niches at a macroevolutionary scale. Instead, we conclude that bioclimatic niches of Antillean Gesneriaceae evolved under phylogenetic conservatism and hypothesize that this macroevolutionary pattern could result from adaptation to temporally variable climates in the Antilles.
Highlights
Deciphering the mechanisms underlying species evolution is key to understand patterns of biodiversity
Another commonly reported pattern is the tendency for closely related species to have similar abiotic niches, a macroevolutionary pattern referred to as phylogenetic niche conservatism [11] where ‘species differ less ecologically than might be expected if ecological diversification had occurred in an unconstrained manner’ [12]
The first two principal axes of the principal component analysis (PCA) represented together 70.16% of the environmental variation present on the islands and the species are widely distributed over the environmental space
Summary
Deciphering the mechanisms underlying species evolution is key to understand patterns of biodiversity. Niche shifts were found to be common in the recent radiations of Pachycladon [7], Oenothera [8], Anolis lizards [9] and plethodontid salamanders [10] By contrast, another commonly reported pattern is the tendency for closely related species to have similar abiotic niches, a macroevolutionary pattern referred to as phylogenetic niche conservatism [11] where ‘species differ less ecologically than might be expected if ecological diversification had occurred in an unconstrained manner’ [12]. According to Wiens [13], the constraints on niche evolution prevent species from adapting to new environmental conditions In such systems, migration is easier than adaptation [4,14], which favours allopatric speciation and the conservation of niche attributes. This process has been suggested to be the cause of diversification in the legume tribe Indigofereae [15] and in some molluscs of the genus Corosella [16], among others
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.