Abstract

Invasive techniques measuring bone turnover have provided useful information but all have limitations. Histomorphometry of the iliac crest provides unique information on the rate of formation both at the cell and at the tissue levels, allows to measure the activation frequency of remodeling units but the assessment of bone resorption is less accurate. In addition, measurement of bone turnover is limited to a small area of the cancellous and of the cortico-endosteal envelope which may not always reflect bone turnover of other sites of the skeleton (Delmas 1988). Calcium kinetic studies have allowed quantification of the increase of bone turnover after the menopause but measurement of calcium accretion rate—an index of bone formation- may be inaccurate in elderly women (Eastcll et al. 1988). Finally the whole body retention of labeled bisphosphonates (WBR), a marker of bone turnover and bone formation has not proved to be very sensitive (Thomsen et al. 1987). These limitations, in addition to the need of no...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.