Abstract
The validity coefficient of dietary questionnaire measurements can be estimated from a triangular comparison between questionnaire, reference, and biochemical marker measurements with the method of triads. The method assumes that the measurements are linearly related to true intake and have independent random errors. We applied the method of triads to examples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. In some examples, Heywood cases occurred, ie, the estimated validity coefficients were > 1 or the validity coefficients were not estimable. Such results are caused by random sampling fluctuations or violation of the model assumptions. One possible violation is a positive correlation between the random errors of questionnaire and reference measurements. We used a bootstrap method to estimate CIs for the validity coefficients. Validity studies with several hundred subjects, more accurate biochemical indicators of dietary intake, or both, are needed to estimate validity coefficients precisely and avoid complications with the bootstrap method.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
