Biochar altered native soil organic carbon by changing soil aggregate size distribution and native SOC in aggregates based on an 8-year field experiment

Abstract

Soil aggregates play an important function in soil carbon sequestration because larger aggregates have higher soil organic carbon contents. A field experiment was set up in 2009 that included four treatments, i.e., B0, B30, B60, and B90 representing biochar application rates of 0, 30, 60, and 90 t ha−1, respectively. In 2017, we investigated the soil aggregate distribution, biochar and n-SOC contents in soil and different aggregate sizes using the ignition method, as well as the contribution of wheat and maize residues to n-SOC content in each aggregate by isotopic analysis. The results showed that, relative to B0, the n-SOC content presented an 14.0% decrease in B30, compared with an 18.8% and 8.2% increase in B60 and B90 (p < 0.05), respectively. Furthermore, the decreased n-SOC content in B30 was due to the decreased proportions of < 53 μm and 1000–250 μm aggregates. The increased n-SOC content in B60 was due to the significantly enhanced proportion of 2000–1000 μm and 1000–250 μm aggregates because the n-SOC contents of these two aggregates size classes were not changed by biochar. However, in B90, the increased n-SOC content was ascribed to the enhanced proportions of 2000–1000 μm and < 53 μm aggregates, although the n-SOC content in 2000–1000 μm aggregate was significantly decreased by biochar. Further analysis showed that the decreased n-SOC content in 2000–1000 μm aggregates was associated with decreased wheat-derived n-SOC content. In synthesis, our study showed a long-term effect of biochar on the n-SOC content by mainly changing soil aggregation and native organic carbon derived from wheat residue, and this effect was dependent on the applied amount. The biochar rate of 60 t ha−1 is recommended for carbon sequestration in terms of the more pronounced negative priming of native SOC, while the feasible combination between other biochars and soils needs further clarification.