Abstract

Using patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) for preclinical cancer research demands proper storage of tumour material to facilitate logistics and to reduce the number of animals needed. We successfully established 45 subcutaneous ovarian cancer PDXs, reflecting all histological subtypes, with an overall take rate of 68%. Corresponding cells from mouse replaced human tumour stromal and endothelial cells in second generation PDXs as demonstrated with mouse-specific vimentin and CD31 immunohistochemical staining. For biobanking purposes two cryopreservation methods, a fetal calf serum (FCS)-based (95%v/v) “FCS/DMSO” protocol and a low serum-based (10%v/v) “vitrification” protocol were tested. After primary cryopreservation, tumour take rates were 38% and 67% using either the vitrification or FCS/DMSO-based cryopreservation protocol, respectively. Cryopreserved tumour tissue of established PDXs achieved take rates of 67% and 94%, respectively compared to 91% using fresh PDX tumour tissue. Genotyping analysis showed that no changes in copy number alterations were introduced by any of the biobanking methods. Our results indicate that both protocols can be used for biobanking of ovarian tumour and PDX tissues. However, FCS/DMSO-based cryopreservation is more successful. Moreover, primary engraftment of fresh patient-derived tumours in mice followed by freezing tissue of successfully established PDXs is the preferred way of efficient ovarian cancer PDX biobanking.

Highlights

  • Mutational status[11] and they preserve copy number variants for multiple generations[12,13]

  • We present our panel of ovarian cancer patient-derived xenograft (PDX) together with two methods to preserve human ovarian tumour tissues, derived from both patients as well as from their corresponding established PDX model

  • We presented our extensive panel of 45 ovarian cancer PDXs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mutational status[11] and they preserve copy number variants for multiple generations[12,13]. PDXs resemble their corresponding patient tumour in terms of biological behaviour with engraftment rates directly correlated with poorer overall survival and increased metastatic potential[3,7,14]. Considering all the aforementioned factors, the need for reliable and suitable preservation methods for ovarian cancer PDX biobanking is indispensable. Such a biobank would ideally serve to store patient material and propagated PDX material for reimplantion when required. We have carefully analysed both methods in terms of take- and growth rate and resemblance to the parental patient tumour using immunohistochemistry and copy number alterations

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call