Abstract

In order to compare a standard chemical-based risk assessment with in vitro genotoxicity assays, two complex environmental mixtures from a wood-preserving site were analyzed in the Salmonella/microsome and E. coli prophage induction assays. Using GC/MS, sample 003 was found to contain relatively low levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and elevated levels of polychlorinated dibenzo- p-dioxins (PCDDs), while sample 005 had higher levels of PAHs and relatively low levels of PCDDs. The complex mixtures were sequentially extracted with methylene chloride and methanol for analysis in Salmonella, or extracted with a 1:1 hexane:acetone mixture for analysis in the E. coli prophage induction assay. At a dose of 1.0 mg/plate in Salmonella strain TA98 with metabolic activation, the methanol extract of sample 003 induced 197 net revertants, while sample 005 induced 436 net revertants. In the prophage induction assay, with activation, the hexane:acetone extract of sample 003 induced a genotoxic response that was slightly lower than that observed with sample 005. The estimated incremental carcinogenic risk for ingestion of PAHs was 1.5E – 3 for sample 003, while for sample 005 the estimated risk was 1.5E – 2. Thus, the sample which induced the maximum response in both bioassays also had the highest estimated cancer risk. However, the frequency of PAH-DNA adducts in both skin and liver tissues was appreciably higher with sample 003 than with sample 005. A combined testing protocol, using both biological and chemical analysis, therefore provides more accurate information from which to assess risk than the use of either method alone.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.