Abstract

BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide with no curative therapy available. Stem cell therapies have been gaining interest as a means to repair the cardiac tissue after MI and prevent the onset of heart failure. Many in vivo reports suggest that the use of stem cells is promising, yet clinical trials suggest that the cells fail to integrate into the native tissue, resulting in limited improvements in cardiac function and repair. To battle this limitation, the combination of using stem cells embedded in a bioactive scaffold that promotes cell retention is growing in interest. Yet, a systematic review of the literature on the use of stem cells embedded in bioactive scaffolds for cardiac repair has not yet been performed. In this protocol, we outline a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical trials in animal MI models that utilize stem cell-embedded scaffolds for cardiac repair and compare their effects to stem cell-treated animals without the use of a scaffold.Methods/designWe will search the following electronic databases: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, and gray literature: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health and Google Scholar. We will only include randomly controlled preclinical trials that have directly investigated the effects of stem cells embedded in a scaffold for cardiac repair in an animal MI model. Two investigators will independently review each article included in the final analysis. The primary endpoint that will be investigated is left ventricular ejection fraction. Secondary endpoints will include infarct size, end systolic volume, end diastolic volume, fractional shortening and left ventricular wall thickness. Pooled analyses will be conducted using the DerSimonian-Laird random effects and Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect models. Between-studies heterogeneity will be quantified and determined using the Tau2 and I2 statistics. Publication bias will be assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and complemented by Begg’s and Egger’s statistical tests. Possible sources of heterogeneity will be assessed using subgroup-meta analysis and meta-regression.DiscussionTo date, the use of scaffolds in myocardial repair has not yet been systematically reviewed. The results of this meta-analysis will aid in determining the efficacy of stem cell-embedded scaffolds for cardiac repair and help bring this therapy to the clinic.

Highlights

  • Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains one of the leading causes of death worldwide with no curative therapy available

  • To date, the use of scaffolds in myocardial repair has not yet been systematically reviewed. The results of this meta-analysis will aid in determining the efficacy of stem cell-embedded scaffolds for cardiac repair and help bring this therapy to the clinic

  • Meta-analyses have been widely used to understand controversial findings in clinical and preclinical trials that use stem cells for cardiac repair [8, 27, 35,36,37]. To add to this growing field of research, we provide a protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis that explores the use of bioactive scaffolds in stem cell-based therapies for cardiac repair

Read more

Summary

Discussion

Meta-analyses are a necessary step in bringing novel therapies to the clinic, as they help to quantitatively review the literature, while systematically exploring validity and bias [33]. There is a need for translational research that aids in bringing more novel and innovative therapies to the clinic In this protocol, we have demonstrated the importance of using bioactive scaffolds for cardiac repair and provide a strategy for systematically reviewing the literature. We have demonstrated the importance of using bioactive scaffolds for cardiac repair and provide a strategy for systematically reviewing the literature The results of this meta-analysis can be used to bring scaffold-based stem cell therapies to the clinic, in hopes of providing heart failure patients with better health outcomes. Reviews and Meta-Analyses; SYRCLE: Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation

Background
Methods/design
No suitable control
Result
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call