Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the bone resorption rate, histomorphometry and immunohistochemical findings of bioactive glass (Biogran; Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) mixed with autogenous bone grafts (1:1) and autogenous bone graft isolate in maxillary sinus elevation surgery.Material and MethodsA total of 9 maxillary sinuses were grafted with Biogran with autogenous bone graft (group 1) and 12 were mixed with autogenous bone graft (group 2). Postoperative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to measure the initial graft volume after 15 days (T1), and 6 months later, another CBCT scan was performed to evaluate the final graft volume (T2) and determine the graft resorption rate. The resorption outcomes were 37.9%±18.9% in group 1 and 45.7%±18.5% in group 2 (P=0.82). After 6 months, biopsies were obtained concurrent with the placement of dental implants; these implants were subjected to histomorphometric analysis and immunohistochemical analysis for tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP).ResultsThe average bone formation in group 1 was 36.6%±12.9 in the pristine bone region, 33.2%±13.3 in the intermediate region, and 45.8%±13.8 in the apical region; in group 2, the values were 34.4%±14.4, 35.0%±13.9, and 42.0%±16.6 of new bone formation in the pristine bone, intermediate, and apical regions, respectively. Immunostaining for TRAP showed poor clastic activity in both groups, which can indicate that those were in the remodeling phase.ConclusionsThe similarity between the groups in the formation and maintenance of the graft volume after 6 months suggests that the bioactive glass mixed with autogenous bone (1:1) can be used safely as a bone substitute for the maxillary sinus lift.

Highlights

  • Rehabilitation of fully or partially edentulous patients in the posterior maxillary bone region is frequently limited by bone quality and quantity, often requiring grafting techniques, especially when implantsupported prostheses are planned7,24

  • A study evaluated the bone formation and maturation in human maxillary sinus augmentation using ChronOS combined with autogenous bone graft in a 1:1 ratio, Bio-Oss added to autogenous bone graft in a 1:1 ratio and autogenous bone graft alone

  • The group grafted with Bio-Oss added to autogenous bone graft in a 1:1 ratio showed slow resorption of graft particles with discrepant outcomes compared with autogenous bone graft alone21

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rehabilitation of fully or partially edentulous patients in the posterior maxillary bone region is frequently limited by bone quality and quantity, often requiring grafting techniques, especially when implantsupported prostheses are planned. Some authors have proposed the mixture of biomaterials to the autogenous bone graft to increase the graft volume without removing large amounts of bone from the donor sites. Besides these desirable results, this technique allows to perform the maxillary sinus bone augmentation using autogenous bone from the oral cavity under local anesthesia to add osteoinductive characteristics to the materials and improve the predictability of long-term resorption. The outcomes showed similar bone formation in the autogenous and ChronOS groups. The group grafted with Bio-Oss added to autogenous bone graft in a 1:1 ratio showed slow resorption of graft particles with discrepant outcomes compared with autogenous bone graft alone

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call