Abstract

Odorant-binding proteins (OBP) are secreted in the nasal mucus at the vicinity of olfactory receptors (ORs). They act, at least, as an interface between hydrophobic and volatile odorant molecules and the hydrophilic medium bathing the ORs. They have also been hypothesized to be part of the molecular coding of odors and pheromones, by forming specific complexes with odorant molecules that could ultimately stimulate ORs to trigger the olfactory transduction cascade. In a previous study, we have evidenced that pig olfactory secretome was composed of numerous olfactory binding protein isoforms, generated by O-GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation. In addition, we have shown that recombinant OBP (stricto sensu) produced in yeast is made up of a mixture of isoforms that differ in their phosphorylation pattern, which in turn determines binding specificity. Taking advantage of the high amount of OBP secreted by a single animal, we performed a similar study, under exactly the same experimental conditions, on native isoforms isolated from pig, Sus scrofa, nasal tissue. Four fractions were obtained by using strong anion exchange HPLC. Mapping of phosphorylation and O-GlcNAcylation sites by CID-nanoLC-MS/MS allowed unambiguous localization of phosphosites at S13 and T122 and HexNAc sites at S13 and S19. T112 or T115 could also be phosphorylated. BEMAD analysis suggested extra phosphosites located at S23, S24, S41, S49, S57, S67, and T71. Due to the very low stoichiometry of GlcNAc-peptides and phosphopeptides, these sites were identified on total mixture of OBP isoforms instead of HPLC-purified OBP isoforms. Nevertheless, binding properties of native OBP isoforms to specific ligands in S. scrofa were monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy. Recombinant phosphorylated OBP-Pichia isoforms bind steroids and fatty acids with slight differences. Native isoforms, that are phosphorylated but also O-GlcNAcylated show radically different binding affinities for the same compounds, which strongly suggests that O-GlcNAcylation increases the binding specificity of OBP isoforms. These findings extend the role of O-GlcNAc in regulating the function of proteins involved in many mechanisms of metabolic homeostasis, including extracellular signaling in olfaction. Data is available via ProteomeXChange with identifier PXD011371.

Highlights

  • In olfaction, one major challenge is to understand how odors are encoded in the nasal cavity by molecular players, olfactory receptors (OR) and odorant-binding proteins (OBP)

  • Competition assays between fluorescent probes and odorant ligands or pheromone components are largely used in olfaction for testing the binding properties and measuring binding affinities of olfactory binding proteins from both insects and mammals

  • OBPs produced in bacteria (Escherichia coli) or in yeast (P. pastoris), the former being unable to perform mammalian PTMs, and the later lacking of a coding sequence for OGT and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-domain specific O-GlcNAc transferase (EOGT) in its genome (Ensembl database search)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One major challenge is to understand how odors are encoded in the nasal cavity by molecular players, olfactory receptors (OR) and odorant-binding proteins (OBP). Since their identification 30 years ago [(1); Nobel Price 2004], most of the OR are still orphan, as their ligands have not been identified. OBPs have been suggested to form a specific complex with a given odorant that could interact with an OR, leading to the initiation of the olfactory transduction cascade Such a molecular coding mechanism requests an equal diversity in odorant molecules, OBPs and ORs. In each mammalian species, only a few genes [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] encode OBPs, whilst the OR family comprises around 1,000 genes [1], and the number of odorants is theoretically unlimited

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call