Abstract

The Supreme Court decision which sentenced dr. Bambang suprapto.Sp.M.Surg. using article 76 of L aw N o 29 Year 2004 on the Practice of Medicine which had been annulled by the Constitutional Court has proved that the Supreme Court has put aside constitutional court's decision on constitutional review. This paper attempts to justify that at any reason, Constitutional Review decision of Constitutional Court still has binding force on the Supreme Court. It is based on four perspectives: 1. Historical perspective 2. Protected object perspective 3. Functional p erspective, and 4. Normative perspective. Keywords: Binding Force, Constitutional Review, Constitutional Court, Supreme Court.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call