Binary subclassification scheme (AUS-Nuclear versus AUS-Other) adequately risk-stratifies thyroid fine needle aspiration specimens classified as Atypia of Undetermined Significance

Abstract

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology previously described 4subclassesof atypia within the Atypia of Undetermined Significance (AUS) category: nuclear (AUS-Nuc), architectural (AUS-A), oncocytic (AUS-Onc), and atypia not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS). Accumulating evidence supports a binary AUS subclassification scheme based primarily on the presence of nuclear atypia only. The purpose of this study is to compare the risk stratification of binary versus 4-tier AUS subclassification systems among AUS nodules with molecular and/or histologic follow-up. Thyroid aspirates classified as AUS and tested using Afirma (Veracyte, Inc.) between 6/2013 and 7/2021 were included. For resected nodules, histological classification was considered as the final outcome. For unresected nodules, benign Afirma results were considered low-risk outcomes, similar to histologically benign nodules. Suspicious or nondiagnostic Afirma results were considered indeterminate outcomes. The prevalence of outcomes warranting surgery (noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features [NIFTP] or cancer) was calculated for each AUS subclass. A total of 559 AUS nodules with Afirma testing were identified. Excluding nodules with indeterminate molecular outcomes, NIFTP/cancer prevalence for AUS-Nuc was 21% (57/266), which was higher than that for AUS-A (6%, 11/188), AUS-Onc (8%, 4/53), and AUS-NOS (0%, 0/9). A binary AUS subclassification scheme based on nuclear atypia showed a significant difference in NIFTP/cancer prevalence (21% versus 6%, P < 0.0001). Binary reporting of AUS subclasses based on nuclear atypia distinguishes cases with a higher risk of NIFTP/cancer. There is a low but non-negligible prevalence of NIFTP/cancer in cases without nuclear atypia.