Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the presentation, management, pathology, and functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing retroperitoneoscopic treatment of bilateral synchronous sporadic RCC at our institution.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the records of 60 patients with bilateral synchronous sporadic RCC who underwent retroperitoneoscopic treatment at the General Hospital of People's Liberation Army from 2008 to 2014. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated and compared among different surgical procedures. The overall survival and recurrence free survival were assessed based on information from recent follow-up.ResultsFifty-six patients underwent bilateral retroperitoneoscopic surgeries in staged procedures, and four patients underwent bilateral retroperitoneoscopic surgeries in simultaneous procedures. Among the former group of patients, 34 underwent bilateral partial nephrectomy, 12 underwent radical nephrectomy followed by partial nephrectomy, and 10 underwent partial nephrectomy followed by radical nephrectomy. Bilateral partial nephrectomy can better preserve renal function (p = 0.040) and the sequence of partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy did not affect functional outcomes (p = 0.790). One patient undergoing simultaneous procedures developed acute renal failure and required temporary hemodialysis. At 3 and 5 years, overall survival rates were 93.0% and 89.4%, and recurrence free survival rates were 90.5% and 81.6%. High nuclear grade (p = 0.014) was related to disease recurrence.ConclusionsStaged bilateral partial nephrectomy was efficient in preserving renal function. The survival of patients with bilateral synchronous sporadic renal tumors was similar to that of patients with unilateral nonmetastatic tumors. Nuclear grade was an independent prognostic factor of disease recurrence.

Highlights

  • Bilateral renal tumors remain relatively uncommon, accounting for 1%- to 5% of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [1,2,3]

  • Fifty-six patients underwent bilateral retroperitoneoscopic surgeries in staged procedures, and four patients underwent bilateral retroperitoneoscopic surgeries in simultaneous procedures. Among the former group of patients, 34 underwent bilateral partial nephrectomy, 12 underwent radical nephrectomy followed by partial nephrectomy, and 10 underwent partial nephrectomy followed by radical nephrectomy

  • Staged bilateral partial nephrectomy was efficient in preserving renal function

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bilateral renal tumors remain relatively uncommon, accounting for 1%- to 5% of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [1,2,3]. Those with bilateral synchronous sporadic RCC are a distinct subpopulation and have a different biological behavior from hereditary bilateral RCC. Surgery is the method of choice to treat bilateral sporadic RCC, because it has a comparable prognosis to that of unilateral sporadic RCC [4,5]. Minimizing treatment-related loss of renal function is of particular importance for bilateral renal tumors. Balancing the need for complete eradication of potentially malignant tissue with the goal of maximal functional preservation of the bilateral synchronous RCC presents a challenge

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call