Abstract

20 patients were diagnosed with OSMF Stage III/IV were included in this comparative study. Surgical intervention was done followed by reconstruction of the raw denuded area; Bilateral (B/L) Nasolabial Flap and B/L Buccal fat pad flap. The use of either flap was subject to patient consent.Interincisal mouth opening and Complications associated with material were the study parameters.In conclusion, Both Nasolabial flap and Buccal pad fat are good options for reconstruction of the defect and we found no statistically significant difference between the two modalities at the end of 6 months post-operative follow up. We conclude Buccal fat pad and Nasolabial flap are both viable reconstruction method in surgical treatment of late stage OSMF.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.