Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and the subjective and objective outcomes of bilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation for pelvic organ prolapse. Study designThis was a single-centre observational study conducted at the University Hospital, Urogynaecological Unit, with a certified urogynaecological surgeon. A cohort of 110 patients receiving modified bilateral sacrospinous fixation following a diagnosis of grade II–IV pelvic organ prolapse and defects of three pelvic compartments. Non-absorbable sutures were placed on each side of the sacrospinous ligament. The main aim was to achieve a minimal tension situation by intentionally leaving suture bridges on both sides of the suspension. The post-surgical follow-up period was 14±7 months. The three characteristics of cure in functional surgery – anatomy, function, and subjective patient's judgement – were evaluated in this study. Primary outcomes were anatomic, functional, and subjective cures, that were measured pre- and postoperatively using the POP-Q system values, a validated pelvic quality-of-life questionnaire (P-QoL/D), and interviews regarding expectations, goal-setting, goal achievement, and satisfaction. Secondary outcome measures included data on surgical complications. Data analysis was performed with descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon tests, and Mann–Whitney U-tests. ResultsA total of 110 patients underwent anterior and posterior colporrhaphy and minimal tension bilateral sacrospinous fixation. An objective anatomic cure was reported for 94.5% of patients, and significant improvement of all prolapse symptoms was observed following surgery (p<0.001). Full or partial fulfilment of the criteria for a subjective cure was demonstrated in 96% of the patients. Only 5.5% of the patients experienced postoperative urinary tract infections. No other complications requiring medical or surgical interventions were reported. ConclusionBilateral minimal tension sacrospinous fixation was associated with low morbidity, as well as excellent anatomic, functional, and subjective results at follow-up.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call