Abstract

This report gives the result of a bilateral comparison of resistance between the NIM (The People's Republic of China) and the BIPM carried out at the end of 2018, beginning of 2019. Two 1 Ω and two 10 kΩ travelling standards belonging to the BIPM were used. The comparison was carried out with an 'A-B-A' pattern of measurements; the standards were measured first at the BIPM for a period of about one month, then for a period of one month at the NIM, and finally again at the BIPM. The measurand was the 4 terminal dc resistance at low power. The BIPM was the pilot laboratory, and the comparison forms part of the ongoing BIPM key comparisons BIPM.EM-K13.a (for 1 Ω) and BIPM.EM-K13.b (for 10 kΩ).The results from the NIM and the BIPM were found to be in good agreement, with a difference smaller than the relative expanded uncertainties (95% confidence, k = 2) for both 1 Ω and 10 kΩ standards. Relative differences are + 0.010 × 10−6 for 1 Ω and − 0.001 × 10−6 for 10 kΩ with a relative expanded uncertainty of 0.034 × 10−6 for 1 Ω and 0.032 × 10−6 for 10 kΩ.KEY WORDS FOR SEARCHResistance; ohm; NIM; The People's Republic of China; BIPM; CIPM MRA; comparison; K13; electricityMain textTo reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCEM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call