Abstract

BackgroundTo analyze the goodness of fit of the load-velocity relationship in a machine-based, single-joint exercise performed both in a bilateral and unilateral manner, as well as to study its accuracy to estimate one repetition maximum (1-RM).MethodsFifteen resistance trained males performed an incremental test in the bilateral and unilateral leg extension exercise up to the 1-RM in two separate occasions. Mean vertical velocity of the weight plates in the leg extension machine was measured for every repetition using a smartphone application (My Lift).ResultsLinear regression analyses showed a high goodness of fit (R2 > 0.93) and small standard errors of estimate (SEE < 5%1-RM) both in the bilateral and unilateral leg extension when individual load-velocity regressions for each participant were computed. Unilateral load-velocity relationships showed significant differences in the intercept of the regression line with the Y-axis and the velocity at each percentage of the 1-RM (Cohen’s d > 1.0, p< 0.05). Finally, non-significant differences were observed between actual and estimated 1-RM from the load-velocity relationships (r = 0.88.0–96, Cohen’s d < 0.2, p> 0.05).ConclusionsThis proof of concept highlights that computing load-velocity relationships in a machine-based, single-joint, angular exercise can be appropriately performed by measuring the mean vertical velocity of the weight plates. These results could help strength and conditioning researchers and coaches who wish to analyze load-velocity relationship in other common machine-based exercises.

Highlights

  • Measuring movement velocity during resistance training is known to be a non-invasive and accurate way to prescribe intensity and manage fatigue [1,2,3,4]

  • Linear regression analyses showed a high goodness of fit (R2 > 0.93) and small standard errors of estimate (SEE < 5%1-repetition maximum (1-RM)) both in the bilateral and unilateral leg extension when individual load-velocity regressions for each participant were computed

  • Non-significant differences were observed between actual and estimated 1-RM from the load-velocity relationships (r = 0.88.0–96, Cohen’s d < 0.2, p> 0.05). This proof of concept highlights that computing load-velocity relationships in a machinebased, single-joint, angular exercise can be appropriately performed by measuring the mean vertical velocity of the weight plates

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Measuring movement velocity during resistance training is known to be a non-invasive and accurate way to prescribe intensity and manage fatigue [1,2,3,4]. Bilateral and unilateral force-velocity relationships of the leg extension exercise and its association with muscular performance have been recently analyzed by measuring the vertical ascent of the weight plates with a linear transducer [13]. The analysis of the load-velocity relationship in the leg extension exercise and its suitability to estimate 1-RM, both in a bilateral and unilateral manner, has not been previously investigated. We hypothesize that there will be a very high association between velocity and load in the leg extension exercise performed in a bilateral and unilateral manner, and that there will be no statistically significant difference between actual and estimated 1-RM. To analyze the goodness of fit of the load-velocity relationship in a machine-based, singlejoint exercise performed both in a bilateral and unilateral manner, as well as to study its accuracy to estimate one repetition maximum (1-RM)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call