Abstract

Broad-based species comparisons across mammalian orders suggest a number of factors that might influence the evolution of large brains. However, the relationship between these factors and total and regional brain size remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between relative brain size and regional brain volumes and sociality in 13 felid species in hopes of revealing relationships that are not detected in more inclusive comparative studies. In addition, a more detailed analysis was conducted of four focal species: lions (Panthera leo), leopards (Panthera pardus), cougars (Puma concolor), and cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus). These species differ markedly in sociality and behavioral flexibility, factors hypothesized to contribute to increased relative brain size and/or frontal cortex size. Lions are the only truly social species, living in prides. Although cheetahs are largely solitary, males often form small groups. Both leopards and cougars are solitary. Of the four species, leopards exhibit the most behavioral flexibility, readily adapting to changing circumstances. Regional brain volumes were analyzed using computed tomography. Skulls (n = 75) were scanned to create three-dimensional virtual endocasts, and regional brain volumes were measured using either sulcal or bony landmarks obtained from the endocasts or skulls. Phylogenetic least squares regression analyses found that sociality does not correspond with larger relative brain size in these species. However, the sociality/solitary variable significantly predicted anterior cerebrum (AC) volume, a region that includes frontal cortex. This latter finding is despite the fact that the two social species in our sample, lions and cheetahs, possess the largest and smallest relative AC volumes, respectively. Additionally, an ANOVA comparing regional brain volumes in four focal species revealed that lions and leopards, while not significantly different from one another, have relatively larger AC volumes than are found in cheetahs or cougars. Further, female lions possess a significantly larger AC volume than conspecific males; female lion values were also larger than those of the other three species (regardless of sex). These results may reflect greater complexity in a female lion’s social world, but additional studies are necessary. These data suggest that within family comparisons may reveal variations not easily detected by broad comparative analyses.

Highlights

  • One hypothesis proposed to explain the evolution of large brains is the social brain hypothesis, which posits that social information processing demands enhanced neural computational capabilities leading to larger brains (Dunbar, 1992)

  • Gross examination of species differences in brain structure indicate that the orientation of, and patterns formed by the sylvian sulcus, suprasylvian sulcus, lateral sulcus, and cruciate sulcus are similar across felids

  • Line drawings of a dorsolateral view of cheetah and leopard brains are shown in Figures 4A,B, respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One hypothesis proposed to explain the evolution of large brains is the social brain hypothesis, which posits that social information processing demands enhanced neural computational capabilities leading to larger brains (Dunbar, 1992). Larger brains over and above that expected for a given body size, larger relative neocortical volume and, in particular, larger relative volume of the frontal lobes all positively correlate with social group size (Dunbar and Bever, 1998; Dunbar, 2011) Whether these findings are unique to primates or apply more generally to other mammalian orders remains unclear. A later study that focused on the four extant hyaenid species (Sakai et al, 2011a,b) found that social group size was positively correlated with relative frontal cortex volume While these last two studies differ somewhat with respect to the variables measured, this discrepancy suggests that analyses at lower taxonomic levels may reveal patterns not detectable in broad species comparisons

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.