Abstract

Funding for “big science” versus “small science” is a contentious topic that often fuels debates among scientists and funders of science. Big science is characterized by major projects such as high-energy particle accelerators and major telescope facilities. These projects are conceived, designed, built, and used by large groups of scientists and engineers. Small science typically involves a principal investigator and a small group of students conducting laboratory research. The scientific enterprise requires both: most scientists are trained in small science, and big science often requires hundreds of small science investigations that are integrated into the grand plan.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call