Abstract
A number of key events took place in the history of the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) in the mid-1980s and early 1990s. This article explores critical developments and debates in the lead up to the 1986 Turangawaewae conference at which the bi-cultural structure of the Association first emerged. The proceedings of the conference itself are examined and the subsequent establishment of a unique system of accountability for ANZASW members discussed. These events are considered significant in the shaping of the Association’s current structure, bi-lingual Code of Ethics (ANZASW, 2015), its competency assessment processes and in its contribution to the era of professional registration.While it is impossible to clearly delineate a beginning point, the article picks up the Association’s story in 1984. It is told from the perspective of the first two Manuhiri Caucus Presidents, Sarah Fraser (1986-1988) and Lynne Briggs (1988 – 1990), and gives voice to some of the participants involved through reference to documents and communications of the time. Other than the points at which the histories of the Manuhiri (later renamed as Tau Iwi) and Tangata Whenua (later renamed as Tangata Whenua Takawaenga o Aotearoa) caucuses intersect, it is the authors’ view that the important and ground breaking history of the Tangata Whenua Caucus is not theirs to relate.
Highlights
O’Brien (2014) presents a strong argument that social work in Aotearoa New Zealand needs to continuously reflect on its practice in a way that is firmly grounded in an understanding of its history and development
This article contributes to the historical record of the Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers (ANZASW) through an exploration of critical developments and debates in the lead up to the 1986 Turangawaewae conference “Social Work in Te Aohurihuri” at which the bi-cultural structure of the Association first emerged
The events that took place at the conference are reviewed and the process leading to the subsequent establishment of a unique system of accountability for ANZASW members discussed
Summary
O’Brien (2014) presents a strong argument that social work in Aotearoa New Zealand needs to continuously reflect on its practice in a way that is firmly grounded in an understanding of its history and development. The departing Tangata Whenua caucus presented a challenge to the Association to continue with its attempts to develop a Code of Practice for social work in Aotearoa (National Executive, 1988). In her outgoing President’s report to the 1988 Annual General Meeting Sarah Fraser wrote: Looking back it is possible to see that the first year attempting to work toward a bi-cultural perspective was one of the most difficult in NZASW’s history, in that it created great chasms between different groups in the Association and caused enormous conflict over our aims, objectives and structures. The board was charged with establishing the new bi-cultural practice standards, assessing applicants, issuing and reviewing the QSWP, and training and supporting assessors (Briggs, 1988)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
