Bicontinuous inverted cubic phase stabilization as an index of antimicrobial and membrane fusion peptide activity

Abstract

Some antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and membrane fusion-catalyzing peptides (FPs) stabilize bicontinuous inverted cubic (QII) phases. Previous authors proposed a topological rationale: since AMP-induced pores, fusion intermediates, and QII phases all have negative Gaussian curvature (NGC), peptides which produce NGC in one structure also do it in another. This assumes that peptides change the curvature energy of the lipid membranes. Here I test this with a Helfrich curvature energy model. First, experimentally, I show that lipid systems often used to study peptide NGC have NGC without peptides at higher temperatures. To determine the net effect of an AMP on NGC, the equilibrium phase behavior of the host lipids must be determined. Second, the model shows that AMPs must make large changes in the curvature energy to stabilize AMP-induced pores. Peptide-induced changes in elastic constants affect pores and QII phase differently. Changes in spontaneous curvature affect them in opposite ways. The observed correlation between QII phase stabilization and AMP activity doesn't show that AMPs act by lowering pore curvature energy. A different rationale is proposed. In theory, AMPs could simultaneously stabilize QII phase and pores by drastically changing two particular elastic constants. This could be tested by measuring AMP effects on the individual constants. I propose experiments to do that. Unlike AMPs, FPs must make only small changes in the curvature energy to catalyze fusion. It they act in this way, their fusion activity should correlate with their ability to stabilize QII phases.