Abstract
The inerrancy of Scripture is often seen as a uniform doctrine. In this article, I argue that one must distinguish between different formulations of this belief. By comparing Carl Fredrik Wisløff’s teachings on biblical inerrancy with the doctrine expressed in the Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy, I show that there are some key differences between them which makes a distinction necessary.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
