Abstract
Recent neuroimaging evidence suggests that the frequency of entrained oscillations in auditory cortices influences the perceived duration of speech segments, impacting word perception [Kösem, A., Bosker, H. R., Takashima, A., Meyer, A., Jensen, O., & Hagoort, P. Neural entrainment determines the words we hear. Current Biology, 28, 2867-2875, 2018]. We further tested the causal influence of neural entrainment frequency during speech processing, by manipulating entrainment with continuous transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at distinct oscillatory frequencies (3 and 5.5 Hz) above the auditory cortices. Dutch participants listened to speech and were asked to report their percept of a target Dutch word, which contained a vowel with an ambiguous duration. Target words were presented either in isolation (first experiment) or at the end of spoken sentences (second experiment). We predicted that the tACS frequency would influence neural entrainment and therewith how speech is perceptually sampled, leading to a perceptual overestimation or underestimation of the vowel's duration. Whereas results from Experiment 1 did not confirm this prediction, results from Experiment 2 suggested a small effect of tACS frequency on target word perception: Faster tACS leads to more long-vowel word percepts, in line with the previous neuroimaging findings. Importantly, the difference in word perception induced by the different tACS frequencies was significantly larger in Experiment 1 versus Experiment 2, suggesting that the impact of tACS is dependent on the sensory context. tACS may have a stronger effect on spoken word perception when the words are presented in continuous speech as compared to when they are isolated, potentially because prior (stimulus-induced) entrainment of brain oscillations might be a prerequisite for tACS to be effective.
Highlights
IntroductionNoninvasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is an increasingly popular technique in auditory and language research (Riecke & Zoefel, 2018; Zoefel & Davis, 2017; Heimrath, Fiene, Rufener, & Zaehle, 2016), with accumulating evidence showing that tACS efficiently affects sound processing and speech comprehension
Noninvasive transcranial alternating current stimulation is an increasingly popular technique in auditory and language research (Riecke & Zoefel, 2018; Zoefel & Davis, 2017; Heimrath, Fiene, Rufener, & Zaehle, 2016), with accumulating evidence showing that tACS efficiently affects sound processing and speech comprehension
Previous evidence shows that neural activity in the auditory cortices tracks the rhythmic structure of the speech signal. This neural tracking is linked to speech processing: Neural tracking is stronger when sentences are intelligible (Ding & Simon, 2013; Peelle, Gross, & Davis, 2013) and indicates how the speech signal is parsed in the brain (Kösem et al, 2018; Ding, Melloni, Zhang, Tian, & Poeppel, 2016; ten Oever & Sack, 2015). tACS is thought to influence neural tracking by modulating oscillatory activity of neural networks ( Witkowski et al, 2016; Thut, Schyns, & Gross, 2011; Fröhlich & McCormick, 2010; but see Asamoah, Khatoun, & Mc Laughlin, 2019) and may provide a technique to test for a causal influence of neural tracking on the comprehension of spoken language
Summary
Noninvasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is an increasingly popular technique in auditory and language research (Riecke & Zoefel, 2018; Zoefel & Davis, 2017; Heimrath, Fiene, Rufener, & Zaehle, 2016), with accumulating evidence showing that tACS efficiently affects sound processing and speech comprehension. The effects of tACS on auditory perception are thought to be mediated by oscillatory neural mechanisms that would be critical for auditory and linguistic processing (Zoefel, ten Oever, & Sack, 2018; Giraud & Poeppel, 2012; Peelle & Davis, 2012). Previous evidence shows that neural activity in the auditory cortices tracks the rhythmic structure of the speech signal This neural tracking is linked to speech processing: Neural tracking is stronger when sentences are intelligible (Ding & Simon, 2013; Peelle, Gross, & Davis, 2013) and indicates how the speech signal is parsed in the brain (Kösem et al, 2018; Ding, Melloni, Zhang, Tian, & Poeppel, 2016; ten Oever & Sack, 2015). This neural tracking is linked to speech processing: Neural tracking is stronger when sentences are intelligible (Ding & Simon, 2013; Peelle, Gross, & Davis, 2013) and indicates how the speech signal is parsed in the brain (Kösem et al, 2018; Ding, Melloni, Zhang, Tian, & Poeppel, 2016; ten Oever & Sack, 2015). tACS is thought to influence neural tracking by modulating oscillatory activity of neural networks ( Witkowski et al, 2016; Thut, Schyns, & Gross, 2011; Fröhlich & McCormick, 2010; but see Asamoah, Khatoun, & Mc Laughlin, 2019) and may provide a technique to test for a causal influence of neural tracking on the comprehension of spoken language
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.