Abstract

BackgroundDuring clinical trials, researchers rarely question nominal doses specified on labels of investigational products, overlooking the potential for inaccuracies that may result when calculating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. This study evaluated the disparity between nominal doses and the doses actually administered in two Phase I trials of a biosimilar drug.MethodsIn Trial A, 12 healthy volunteers received various doses of an interferon β-1a biosimilar via either subcutaneous or intravenous injection, prepared by partially emptying 0.53 ml syringes supplied by the manufacturer. In Trial B, 12 volunteers received three different formulations of the drug via intravenous injection (biosimilar with and without albumin and a comparator), followed by multiple subcutaneous injections. In both trials, the dose administered was calculated as D = C × V − losses, where C is the drug concentration assessed using ELISA, V is the volume administered calculated using syringe weighing and losses are deduced from in-vitro experiments. Interferon binding to added albumin and infusion lines was evaluated using a 125I-interferon tracer with gel-filtration chromatography.ResultsIn Trial A, measured concentrations were close to the nominal strength indicated by the manufacturer (median bias: −6 %), whereas in Trial B they differed significantly for all three formulations (median biases: +67 %, +73 % and +31 % for the biosimilar with albumin, the biosimilar without albumin and the comparator, respectively). In Trial A, the doses actually administered showed large variability and biases, especially at the lowest doses. Indeed, actually injected volumes differed by as much as 74 % from theoretical volumes – a phenomenon mainly attributed to unnoticed fluid re-aspiration through the syringe needle. This was corrected in Trial B. Interferon was not significantly adsorbed on the infusion lines used for intravenous administration. Its binding to albumin was slow, reaching 50 % after a 16 h incubation.ConclusionsThese examples illustrate the importance of assessing the actual doses administered in clinical trials, to ensure accuracy in the determination of clearance, distribution volume, bioavailability and dose–response relationships.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT02515695 (Trial A) and NCT02517788 (Trial B). Registered on 24 July and 5 August 2015, respectively.

Highlights

  • During clinical trials, researchers rarely question nominal doses specified on labels of investigational products, overlooking the potential for inaccuracies that may result when calculating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters

  • A literature review revealed a striking contrast between the great attention devoted to analytical methods and the mathematical modelling of pharmacokinetic data in clinical trials, and the lack of care paid to the pharmaceutical aspects of drug administration [1]

  • We have previously proposed six criteria with which to identify clinical trials that might be especially at risk of an error when measuring drug concentrations in body fluids (Table 1) [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Researchers rarely question nominal doses specified on labels of investigational products, overlooking the potential for inaccuracies that may result when calculating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. This study evaluated the disparity between nominal doses and the doses administered in two Phase I trials of a biosimilar drug. Many clinical researchers assume that the dose is the nominal amount declared on the drug’s label, overlooking noticeable biases that inaccuracies may introduce in the assessment of pharmacokinetic parameters [1]. A retrospective literature analysis of 193 articles showed that about one quarter of clinical trials met at least three of these criteria, indicating a clear need for more accurate assessments of the doses administered to subjects. Accurate determination of administered doses is rarely, if at all, included in current trial procedures

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.